Revision as of 20:59, 10 November 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by SBHans13 - "→Age of HL Tauri system: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:26, 10 November 2014 edit undoHuntster (talk | contribs)Administrators47,426 edits →Age of HL Tauri system: reply.Next edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The newest article seems to state that the system is approximately 1,000,000 years old while the older reference in the synopsis states only 100,000 years old. Is there a need to update the synopsis with the new information perhaps? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | The newest article seems to state that the system is approximately 1,000,000 years old while the older reference in the synopsis states only 100,000 years old. Is there a need to update the synopsis with the new information perhaps? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
:Until a paper can be produced showing that data, I'd prefer to use the refereed material over a press release. Also, the ESO release seems to be saying that the system is a maximum of a million years old, not that it ''is'' a million years. <span style="white-space:nowrap; text-shadow:gray 5px 3px 1px;">— ] <small>(] ] ])</small></span> 21:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:26, 10 November 2014
Astronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Thanks for the article!
Thanks. Rursus dixit. (bork!) 11:55, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Age of HL Tauri system
The newest article seems to state that the system is approximately 1,000,000 years old while the older reference in the synopsis states only 100,000 years old. Is there a need to update the synopsis with the new information perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBHans13 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Until a paper can be produced showing that data, I'd prefer to use the refereed material over a press release. Also, the ESO release seems to be saying that the system is a maximum of a million years old, not that it is a million years. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)