Revision as of 21:58, 11 November 2014 editThegreyanomaly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,935 edits →Ties with Unity section: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:34, 11 November 2014 edit undoPrisonermonkeys (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users35,281 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It was made clear after the game was announced that Rogue would be tied to Unity in some way. We now know that reason, and it needs to be listed. Misplaced Pages does not ] and does not care about ]. This section, to my knowledge, was first reverted at 11:06, 9 November 2014 by {{u|Prisonermonkeys}} and then reinstated and reverted multiple time (with Prisonermonkeys still being active on the conflict). There is no policy based reason for removing this content. When someone writes the synopsis they can add this to the end of that, but until then there is no reason to remove the section. ] (]) 21:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC) | It was made clear after the game was announced that Rogue would be tied to Unity in some way. We now know that reason, and it needs to be listed. Misplaced Pages does not ] and does not care about ]. This section, to my knowledge, was first reverted at 11:06, 9 November 2014 by {{u|Prisonermonkeys}} and then reinstated and reverted multiple time (with Prisonermonkeys still being active on the conflict). There is no policy based reason for removing this content. When someone writes the synopsis they can add this to the end of that, but until then there is no reason to remove the section. ] (]) 21:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not removing it because of spoilers or censorship. I'm removing it because it's badly-written and doesn't put the scene in any kind of context. It might be important to demonstrate the connections between the texts, but your problem is that, in its current form, it doesn't offer any insight as to how it is related to the events of ''Rogue'', which is a problem because this article is ABOUT ''Rogue''. | |||
:Ideally, it would be included in a full write-up of the plot so that the reader can understand it in context. If you do not know the plot, why are you trying to explain it? You have presented something as being instrumental to the story without explaining ''how'' or ''why'' it is so important. ] (]) 22:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:34, 11 November 2014
Ties with Unity section
It was made clear after the game was announced that Rogue would be tied to Unity in some way. We now know that reason, and it needs to be listed. Misplaced Pages does not censor and does not care about spoiling. This section, to my knowledge, was first reverted at 11:06, 9 November 2014 by Prisonermonkeys and then reinstated and reverted multiple time (with Prisonermonkeys still being active on the conflict). There is no policy based reason for removing this content. When someone writes the synopsis they can add this to the end of that, but until then there is no reason to remove the section. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 21:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not removing it because of spoilers or censorship. I'm removing it because it's badly-written and doesn't put the scene in any kind of context. It might be important to demonstrate the connections between the texts, but your problem is that, in its current form, it doesn't offer any insight as to how it is related to the events of Rogue, which is a problem because this article is ABOUT Rogue.
- Ideally, it would be included in a full write-up of the plot so that the reader can understand it in context. If you do not know the plot, why are you trying to explain it? You have presented something as being instrumental to the story without explaining how or why it is so important. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)