Misplaced Pages

:General sanctions/Gamergate/Requests for enforcement: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:General sanctions | Gamergate Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:24, 13 November 2014 view sourceNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,475 edits Video game journalism: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 01:25, 13 November 2014 view source NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,475 edits Video game journalismNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
== Video game journalism == == Video game journalism ==


Article is currently under attack by an anonymous IP inserting discredited and specious claims about a living person related to the controversy. Needs semi-protection. ] (]) 01:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC) The ] article is currently under attack by an anonymous IP repeatedly inserting discredited and specious claims about a living person related to the controversy, while refusing to engage in discussion on the talk page. Needs semi-protection. ] (]) 01:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:25, 13 November 2014

Notice of obsolescence:
Community sanctions in this area of conflict have been superseded by an Arbitration Committee sanctions regime. As a result, this community sanctions-related page is now obsolete, is retained only for historical reference, and should not be modified. For more information about Arbitration Committee sanctions, see this page. For the specific Committee decision that rescinded or modified these community sanctions, see WP:ARBGG.

Video game journalism

The Video game journalism article is currently under attack by an anonymous IP repeatedly inserting discredited and specious claims about a living person related to the controversy, while refusing to engage in discussion on the talk page. Needs semi-protection. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Categories: