| Revision as of 01:28, 17 November 2014 editLegacypac (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers158,031 edits notification of edit warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:34, 17 November 2014 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,068 edits →Community sanctions block: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | ||
| == Community sanctions block == | |||
| <div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> To enforce a {{#if:|]| ]}}, and for violating ] on the page ], as described at ], ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to ] once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact the ] at ''{{NoSpam|arbcom-appeals-en|lists.wikimedia.org}}''. ] (]) 01:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:'''<br>Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or seek consensus at a community noticeboard.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-csblock --> | |||
Revision as of 01:34, 17 November 2014
Big improvement on the neutrality od the Boko Haram background section. Thanks! 173.74.85.245 (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- How do you mean exactly? zzz (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Your welcome, I guess zzz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The edit to remove the section that was not well written. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Boko_Haram&diff=632424781&oldid=632377590 173.74.85.245 (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks.zzz (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Onymous may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ], ] and ].<ref name=crypto/> Agora already offered more listings than Silk
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
2014 Hong Kong protest
If you find one of sources used in the article unreliable, go to Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and ask about it. (That's someone else's suggestion, by the way.) --George Ho (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Do not suppress different opinions and remove contents without due justification. You will be reported to administrator if continuing to do so.
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Recreational drug use
- added links pointing to DMT and Synthesize
- Operation Onymous
- added a link pointing to Tweet
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Can you please revert your edit
You recently made changes to the article Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in this edit. I was notified of the situation by a fellow editor who correctly noted that the content had been decided on by the careful seeking of consensus as you will see through reference at Talk:ISIL. Please can you revert the edit. Gregkaye ✍♪ 14:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think my edit improves the article immensely, so I can't revert the edit. I explained the reasons in the edit summary. Sometimes editors get too attached to excess verbiage, and it requires someone else who hasn't been involved in its production to see what needs to go. The lead is clearly too long, and I identified the bits that just aren't worthwhile. I can only suggest you seek another opinion from another fresh pair of eyes. I believe the article is much better with the edit - I'm either right or wrong, I guess! If you want to add back
- the supposed "claims and aims" (According to who? when? depending on what? who thinks/believes any of this? etc) in the lead, and then finish with
- "The group's actions, authority and theological interpretations have been widely criticized around the world and notably within the Muslim community." (Why would you think that anyone needs to read that, exactly? What information does that impart? Etc...)
then I suggest you think of a reason for doing so. (Better than "that's what *we* decided")! zzz (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at ISIL
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Myopia123 (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Community sanctions block
To enforce a community decision, and for violating WP:1RR on the page Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, as described at WP:GS/SCW,
lists.wikimedia.org. Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators:
Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or seek consensus at a community noticeboard.