| Revision as of 04:46, 21 November 2014 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits →Arbcom talk comment: changing the order of the diffs to make it less confusing← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:50, 21 November 2014 view source Neotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits →Arbcom talk comment: Who is misrepresenting sources in articles, TKOP, and what is your evidenceNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| :Seriously? The narratives have no relation to the truth, much less the diffs. Makes one wonder about Tarf's additions to articles. Probably misrepresenting sources as well.]<span style="font-style:italic"><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 16:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | :Seriously? The narratives have no relation to the truth, much less the diffs. Makes one wonder about Tarf's additions to articles. Probably misrepresenting sources as well.]<span style="font-style:italic"><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 16:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::Who is misrepresenting sources in articles, ], are you talking about me or User:Tarc? What do you mean by that, and what is your evidence for such an accusation? | |||
Revision as of 04:50, 21 November 2014
How to disable Media Viewer:
- At the top of your page when you are logged in: Preferences > Appearance > Files.
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
- User talk:Neotarf/Other stuff (including link to discussion about "retired" banner)
- User talk:Neotarf/Jimbo civility speech transcript Wikimania civility speech, August 2014
Arbcom talk comment
Hello Neotarf.
I'm puzzled by your recent comment at Arbcom talk. As far as I know, you never addressed me or mentioned me until you posted a proposal at ANI first week of September concerning page bans for me, Eric and Pork]. None of the assembled GGTF participants, in fact nobody at all (other than you) endorsed your proposal. Your narrative in today's comment gives a very different impression. As you may recall, in my case, I voluntarily withdrew from posting at GGTF in September because my efforts were not welcome there. At any rate, I just would like to suggest you check your narrative against whatever diffs you need to check to ensure that it's accurate. As you know, I've previously posted on the Decision Talk page about the importance of Principle 4 and I feel that everyone should be especially careful about fact checking and documentation in this case. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 15:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I addressed you on your talk page. , and (in response to ), and an admin addressed you on your talk page as well. "I set the page up hoping it could become a place where women especially – and perhaps in particular new women editors – could feel relaxed, and might want to exchange ideas about working together or helping each other, or how to encourage other women. So anything that keeps the atmosphere friendly and warm would be very helpful." . Carol agreed to either a one-way or two-way interaction ban, but you were the one who would not agree to any voluntary interaction ban, which is when the community enacted your one-way interaction ban with Carol. —Neotarf (talk) 04:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Seriously? The narratives have no relation to the truth, much less the diffs. Makes one wonder about Tarf's additions to articles. Probably misrepresenting sources as well.Two kinds of porkBacon 16:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Who is misrepresenting sources in articles, Two kinds of pork, are you talking about me or User:Tarc? What do you mean by that, and what is your evidence for such an accusation?