| Revision as of 00:51, 25 November 2014 view sourceLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive 033) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:07, 3 December 2014 view source Kraxler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,578 edits →neutral RfC notification: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| Hi BHG. I noticed that you seemed to reduce your editing after early August, and infer this might be related to some of the offensive discussions that happened around the end of July (a regrettable result and one that I hope will be set right eventually). Those events have been taken up at Arbitration in two different cases. I believe you are aware of the GenderGap case, but there is now a second case against DangerousPanda, and his summary reversal of has been presented as evidence by {{U|MrX}}. I'm letting you know so that you would have an opportunity to comment if you wanted to do so. Sincerely, ] <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC) | Hi BHG. I noticed that you seemed to reduce your editing after early August, and infer this might be related to some of the offensive discussions that happened around the end of July (a regrettable result and one that I hope will be set right eventually). Those events have been taken up at Arbitration in two different cases. I believe you are aware of the GenderGap case, but there is now a second case against DangerousPanda, and his summary reversal of has been presented as evidence by {{U|MrX}}. I'm letting you know so that you would have an opportunity to comment if you wanted to do so. Sincerely, ] <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == neutral RfC notification == | |||
| ] has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously voted or opined at ] thanks. ] (]) 17:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:07, 3 December 2014
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
I regard admin powers as a privilege to be used sparingly and judiciously, but if you require the assistance of an admin, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page.
If you want admin help, please do try to explain clearly what you want done, and why, and please do remember to include any relevant links or diffs. I'll try to either help you myself or direct you to a more experienced person if appropriate.If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.WikiProject Women writers Invitation
.jpg) |
Hello BrownHairedGirl! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement! |
Postmaster General of Scotland
Since we last talked about this topic, I have done quite a bit of reading and research, and now have an in-progress draft at User:Ww2censor/PMGS. The first issue to decide is on the most appropriate article title in mainspace (include deputy or not, and appropriate redirects) which the history section talks about. I'm surprised there are no wiki articles for the pre-1710 office holders, even the two peers have nothing, not even redlinks, and there is scarcely anything online either, just the Haldane book and the list on page 17 of Lang which does not look like it was part of the original publication. If you have some sources, or can point me to any, it would be great. I'm also surprised that Lord Francis Gray has no article either. Do you think this is sufficient for mainspace or should I still work on it? Thoughts? ww2censor (talk) 11:51, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've been away but have you had a chance to look at this? ww2censor (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is now in mainspace at Postmaster General for Scotland. Have a look when you return to activity. Hope you are OK. ww2censor (talk) 12:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
A request for your time and consideration
I've made an appeal to the AN board that has gone unattended by an uninvolved admin for some time. It's become rather stale and I'd very much like a resolution one way or another. I sought you and two other editors out because I've appreciated your judgement in previous instances. Please understand that this isn't an appeal for your help, that's neither appropriate nor especially constructive. Instead I simply want this matter attended to by competent people who can impart a measure of finality at WP:AN. I'll totally understand your declining to review my appeal but I hope you'll consider giving it some of your time, even if it's to refer another administrator. GraniteSand (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Update
Hi BHG. I noticed that you seemed to reduce your editing after early August, and infer this might be related to some of the offensive discussions that happened around the end of July (a regrettable result and one that I hope will be set right eventually). Those events have been taken up at Arbitration in two different cases. I believe you are aware of the GenderGap case, but there is now a second case against DangerousPanda, and his summary reversal of your block has been presented as evidence by MrX. I'm letting you know so that you would have an opportunity to comment if you wanted to do so. Sincerely, Jehochman 19:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
neutral RfC notification
Template_talk:Succession_box#RfC has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously voted or opined at Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 April 6#Template:NYRepresentatives thanks. Kraxler (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)