Revision as of 02:31, 3 December 2014 view sourcePudeo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,188 edits New request: Missvian (in progress)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:35, 3 December 2014 view source Pudeo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,188 edits →MissvainNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<!-- The editor filing the case will automatically be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | ;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | ||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | <!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | ||
* | |||
*Diff user 1 | |||
*Diff user 2 | |||
*Diff user 3 | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | <!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | ||
* | |||
*Link 1 | |||
* | |||
*Link 2 | |||
==Statement by Pudeo== | |||
Adminstrator {{u|Missvain}}, previously known as SarahStierch, was forced out from her Wikimedia Foundation employee position due to a conflict of interest, editing the English Misplaced Pages on behalf of paying clients on January 9, 2014. | |||
Back in January, there were several threads on her user page (, ) requesting a comment and clarification from her regarding paid-editing. Some criticized her for not responding and suggested that ArbCom will have to take action if she does not reply, while others assumed good faith and allowed her to have a "wikibreak". However, she did not leave a single reply on her talk page and instead archived the threads: . | |||
Thus, she failed to comply with ] and it looks bad to just ignore things until enough people have forgotten. Her username change from SarahStierch to Missvain in July 2014 is also problematic regarding accountability, even if the change was done for legitimate reasons. | |||
It is unfortunate this request is filed only now, but seeing as the case even attracted mainstream media attention and the paid-editing happened here, I think sweeping things under the carpet is not the way to go. I directly filed this request because the ArbCom is the only place where admins can be held accountable or desysopped and Missvain has ignored the previous threads. | |||
Due to the WMF already investigating and acting on the COI, perhaps the ArbCom could process this as a Motion instead of a full proceeding. | |||
=== Statement by Missvain === | === Statement by Missvain === | ||
Revision as of 02:35, 3 December 2014
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Missvain | 3 December 2014 | {{{votes}}} | |
Statement by Pudeo | No date given | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsRequest name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Armenia-Azerbaijan_3 | none | (orig. case) | 3 January 2025 |
Motion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Missvain
Initiated by Pudeo' at 02:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Pudeo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Missvain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by Pudeo
Adminstrator Missvain, previously known as SarahStierch, was forced out WMF email from her Wikimedia Foundation employee position due to a conflict of interest, editing the English Misplaced Pages on behalf of paying clients on January 9, 2014.
Back in January, there were several threads on her user page (Thread 1, Thread 2) requesting a comment and clarification from her regarding paid-editing. Some criticized her for not responding and suggested that ArbCom will have to take action if she does not reply, while others assumed good faith and allowed her to have a "wikibreak". However, she did not leave a single reply on her talk page and instead archived the threads: Missvain's January 2014 contribs.
Thus, she failed to comply with WP:ADMINACCT and it looks bad to just ignore things until enough people have forgotten. Her username change from SarahStierch to Missvain in July 2014 is also problematic regarding accountability, even if the change was done for legitimate reasons.
It is unfortunate this request is filed only now, but seeing as the case even attracted mainstream media attention and the paid-editing happened here, I think sweeping things under the carpet is not the way to go. I directly filed this request because the ArbCom is the only place where admins can be held accountable or desysopped and Missvain has ignored the previous threads.
Due to the WMF already investigating and acting on the COI, perhaps the ArbCom could process this as a Motion instead of a full proceeding.
Statement by Missvain
Statement by {Non-party}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Missvain: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-Statement_by_Pudeo">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)