Revision as of 20:01, 13 July 2006 editVhgk3z5b (talk | contribs)2,846 edits rv rm of NPA warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:37, 13 July 2006 edit undoNigelj (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,869 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:What do you think? Shall we take this discussion to the Internet Talk page to see what others think? Apart from that niggle in my mind, I think it reads fine as it is now, after your recent edit. --] 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | :What do you think? Shall we take this discussion to the Internet Talk page to see what others think? Apart from that niggle in my mind, I think it reads fine as it is now, after your recent edit. --] 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
== on ]== | |||
With respect to , the statement "about which he apparently knows so little" is clearly a personal attack. I am therefore regretfully adding the following warning template to your talk page: | |||
With regards to your comments on ]: Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. ''"Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Misplaced Pages. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users."'' Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. <!-- Template:NPA-n --> ] 05:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:37, 13 July 2006
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 12:28, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Negligible
Yes, interesting idea to have this page so that others can be linked to it. It may need expanding tho' to cover all possible uses of the term 'negligible'. Perhaps the page should have been called 'Negligibilty' but thats a bit of a mouthful!!. :-) Light current 13:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yes I understand. But 'negligibility' can be redirected to 'negligible' can it not? Light current 18:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
WWW
I'll comment on the WWW definition on that talk page. Jeremy J. Shapiro 19:50, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Breidbart quote in Internet
Nigel, I've cleaned up the punctuation to fix my transcription error. The quote does actually make sense: in fact, it's actually a reasonably succinct and accurate description of what the Internet is: in plain-ish English, it means "the largest group of computers that can all both successfully send IP packets to, and receive IP packets from, every other computer in that group". Seth Breidbart could have left out the "reflexive, transitive, symmetric closure" bit, since that's implied by "equivalence class", and simply said: " the largest equivalence class of the binary relation 'can be reached by an IP packet from'", but it wouldn't have been nearly as funny. -- The Anome 09:37, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
stay mouse
I want to commend you on your excellent edits to Stay mouse; what was once incomprehensible and ineffective is now an interesting and valuable reference work. Great job! -- Rmrfstar 22:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Electric boat pollution
What am I to do regarding the discussion Talk:Electric boat and reversions happening at Electric boat? There doesn't seem to be much chance of convincing this person that the boat is non-polluting. I'm tempted to revert the article and reply to the latest comment pointing out a number of non-polluting electricity sources, but I'm sure that it would not do any good. Perhaps it would be best to simply let this cool off and revert it next week. What do you think? --D0li0 09:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Ajax (programming) / pronunciation
Hi. I agree to leave your edition while we discuss the factuality of pronunciation "A-JAX". Would you be so kind as to start a discussion concerning this on the talk page? -- Kirils 22:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
re: Template:Free software
Well, I did notice that it was being used statically in quite a few articles, so I thought it'd be good to use it again. It'd be nice to get any help possible, sure. Do you have any suggestions for where to put it other than articles that focus on something involving free software? -Matt 00:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
RE: Dark web
The main article that I am basing my edit off of is "", in which "dark web" and "dark web space" refer to hosts that are intentionally hidden, and talks of them specifically launching SMTP and other DoS attacks (not limited to what is correctly called "the web"); I have seen this elsewhere too, if you like I can try to find more references for it. I understand that it is a misnomer, but it is how the term is commonly used. If you feel that it is commonly used also to refer to the deep web, then we should make it into a disambiguation page. --DDG 22:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Rewriting World Wide Web
I just created a major rewrite proposal for the World Wide Web article which is currently a shameful mess. As you recently contributed to the debate, I'd like to invite you to join our efforts. This article needs some love: come and submit your ideas! -- JFG 05:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Sunday Times Golden Globe Race
Hi, I thought you might be interested to know that the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race article is up for FAC. If you like, I'd welcome your comments on the FAC review page. — Johan the Ghost seance 16:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! You made my Quote of the Week
Your edit summary from Masturbation, "A story about Jim Morrison getting drunk is not what 'historic chronicles' normally refers to", has made my duo quote of the week! Happy editing. Teke 04:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
XPath
Hi Nigelj, you rolled back an edit I made to XPath. Sorry for not leaving a comment but the example
//a/@target
is wrong. The part ../div
of the second predicate specifies the div
children of the parent (i.e. the a
element's siblings) whereas the explanation speaks of a div
parent. The expression can be fixed by replacing this bit with parent::div
i.e. changing the expression to //a/@target
.
Hwiechers 20:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Hwiechers, you're absolutely right! That's what I get for not testing code! What it turns out that I meant was
//a/@target
. However what you suggest works just as well except that it mixes the full and abreviated syntaxes, although there's no rule against that. I've corrected the page. Thanks for your help and well spotted! --Nigelj 21:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
The brief definition of the Internet
hi Nigelj,
you removed the brief definition i added and mentioned that it was repetitive, though i didnt actually see the place of repetition. of course, the complete explanation of this concept contains the meaning of "network of networks" but does not give a clear outline. see here:
"The Internet .... is the .... interconnected computer networks that .... (IP). It consists of millions .... networks, which .... of the World Wide Web."
70 words! a reader has to extract the core meaning, "network of networks", him/herself after reading the 70 words. why dont we just give it out directly?
how about this? to give the brief definition at first, then expand it to the above complete definition? to make it smooth and integrated.
regards,
--bbao 11:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Bbao
- The repetitions I spoke of were the existing phrases. "system of interconnected computer networks" and, in the other paragraph, "collection of interconnected computer networks". What I liked about those two phrases was the way that the words can easily be contracted from interconnected networks to inter-net, showing the origin of the word (maybe via internetworked networks, but I don't imagine anyone really cares about that).
- I'm not 100% convinced that network of networks is the best introductory phrase, as it conjures for me an image of separate, island networks with single links joining them up to their neighbours. I think the real internet is much more intertwingled than that with dozens of routes from any host to any other - hence the fault tolerance.
- What do you think? Shall we take this discussion to the Internet Talk page to see what others think? Apart from that niggle in my mind, I think it reads fine as it is now, after your recent edit. --Nigelj 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)