Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:28, 8 December 2014 editRGloucester (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits Little statement as to history, removing now redundant← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:29, 8 December 2014 edit undoRGloucester (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits ceNext edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{historical\|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.\|brief=yes}}		{{historical\|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.\|brief=yes}}

	Prior to {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|a discussion}} at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was wound up on 7 December 2014		Prior to {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|a discussion}} at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was wound up on 7 December 2014.

Revision as of 02:29, 8 December 2014

WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME)

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion.
Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues.

Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was wound up on 7 December 2014.

Category:

Inactive project pages

Revision as of 02:28, 8 December 2014 editRGloucester (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits Little statement as to history, removing now redundant← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:29, 8 December 2014 edit undoRGloucester (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits ceNext edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{historical\|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.\|brief=yes}}		{{historical\|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.\|brief=yes}}

	Prior to {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|a discussion}} at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was wound up on 7 December 2014		Prior to {{oldid\|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U\|637099409\|a discussion}} at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was wound up on 7 December 2014.