Misplaced Pages

User talk:Damiens.rf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 8 December 2014 editDamiens.rf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,536 edits RE: Reverting List of Puerto Rican slang words and phrases← Previous edit Revision as of 11:29, 12 December 2014 edit undoCodename Lisa (talk | contribs)55,077 edits TK userbox icon.svg → TK archive icon.svg (The former is being deleted)Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
}}|19:08, 7 July 2011}} }}|19:08, 7 July 2011}}
<br clear="all/> <br clear="all/>
{{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}} {{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K

Revision as of 11:29, 12 December 2014

Template:Expiry


Archives

1, 2, 3



This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

SimilarWeb improvements

Hello, please let me know why did you put the tags again? I made changes according to your requirements. Is there anything else I can do to bring the page in accordance with the Misplaced Pages requirements, so that you could remove the tags?

Thanks Cohentom (talk) 13:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

@Cohentom:, the article is currently completely based on primary sources (like crunchbase, alexa and venturedeal) or unreliable promotion-disguised-as-news sites like smartinsights, 3scale and startupcamel.com.
The text of the article reads as a press-release. What's the point of that "Technology" section?
You're free to promote your projects around the Web, but Misplaced Pages is not the place to do that. --damiens.rf 16:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

RE: reverting Jason Narvy

Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/

Re:hanging editor's comment

What the heck, when you are right, you are right. Tony the Marine (talk)

Top Banana

You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. Antonio Camilo Martin (dime aca) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Reverting List of Puerto Rican slang words and phrases

I'm trying to say this in the nicest way possible. However, the article already has way more than three words referenced, however, why do you only allow three of these to pass by, huh? Liston, the article already states so at the top of it having multiple issues, if you know how to read, douchebag. So just let it be, as there's already a statement claiming it having multiple issues at the top than just leaving the damn article close to being scarce of three referenced words of crap, thanks to you. So please just stop angering everyone, including me, and contribute your positiveness on Misplaced Pages and stop vandalizing every article that you can by being a references police, if you kindly could now? Marioluigi98 (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Was that really the "nicest way possible" to you? --damiens.rf 13:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)