| Revision as of 00:16, 21 December 2014 editDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,915 edits →December 2014: comments on the edit war← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:14, 21 December 2014 edit undoDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,915 edits →December 2014: correctionNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| In your ANI post you just ratted yourself out for breaking the 3rr rule. You should stop before someone important notices, or you'll likely edit up with a block. Editors are not required to discuss an issue to your personal satifisfaction -- if you're unhappy with the outcome of a discussion about your only option is to get more folks involved, through processes such as ] or ]. <small>]</small> 23:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC) | In your ANI post you just ratted yourself out for breaking the 3rr rule. You should stop before someone important notices, or you'll likely edit up with a block. Editors are not required to discuss an issue to your personal satifisfaction -- if you're unhappy with the outcome of a discussion about your only option is to get more folks involved, through processes such as ] or ]. <small>]</small> 23:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Hi |
Hi E-960. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. You have been edit warring to retain unsourced content in the article in spite of the objections of at least five editors over the course of the last two days, and there are none who agree that the content should stay in. You could be blocked for edit warring right now with the reverts you have made on the page. I suggest you remove the disputed content yourself, as there's no consensus to leave it in. -- ] (]) 00:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:14, 21 December 2014
E-960, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi E-960! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
WWII
Hello E-960,
I saw you removed this picture from World War II article. Would it be possible for you to put it to a different spot instead of just removing it? This picture in this article is very important for Misplaced Pages:GLAM/BAnQ/Poirier Project I'm currently working on with National Archives since we are collecting some stats. All this to say can help me to find a spot for it. Thanks in advance. Best regards. Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
WP:ANI#Personal abuse and anti-Australian slurs by User:E-960
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 11:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Calidum 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
In your ANI post you just ratted yourself out for breaking the 3rr rule. You should stop before someone important notices, or you'll likely edit up with a block. Editors are not required to discuss an issue to your personal satifisfaction -- if you're unhappy with the outcome of a discussion about your only option is to get more folks involved, through processes such as WP:DRN or WP:RFC. NE Ent 23:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi E-960. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. You have been edit warring to retain unsourced content in the article in spite of the objections of at least five editors over the course of the last two days, and there are none who agree that the content should stay in. You could be blocked for edit warring right now with the reverts you have made on the page. I suggest you remove the disputed content yourself, as there's no consensus to leave it in. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)