| Revision as of 21:15, 22 December 2014 editNickOrnstein (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,678 edits →User:NickOrnstein← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:15, 22 December 2014 edit undoNickOrnstein (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,678 edits →User:NickOrnsteinNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Per nomination. Userpage contains information already available in ] and ]. Possibly ] as user doesn't appear to be doing much editing outside of their userpage. ] (]) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Per nomination. Userpage contains information already available in ] and ]. Possibly ] as user doesn't appear to be doing much editing outside of their userpage. ] (]) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - This is my page; I don't understand why that after SIX YEARS that all of a sudden a random nobody wants to shut my page down. I have had lists on my page for years. Aren't there more important issues to tackle, in regards to vandalizers to pages, besides my page that is absolutely no burden. This is NOT an article; no harm is being done to anybody except yourselves. TONS of other users from WikiProject: Oldest People have lists of the oldest people in the world on their page. I don't care about how high you rank (whether general or private) on Misplaced Pages; worry about yourself, pal. It is a website with information about older people, not a Hit List. Leave us fantastic contributors to the Oldest people articles alone. Thank you. --] (]) 21:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''ABSOULETLY, totally Keep''' - This is my page; I don't understand why that after SIX YEARS that all of a sudden a random nobody wants to shut my page down. I have had lists on my page for years. Aren't there more important issues to tackle, in regards to vandalizers to pages, besides my page that is absolutely no burden. This is NOT an article; no harm is being done to anybody except yourselves. TONS of other users from WikiProject: Oldest People have lists of the oldest people in the world on their page. I don't care about how high you rank (whether general or private) on Misplaced Pages; worry about yourself, pal. It is a website with information about older people, not a Hit List. Leave us fantastic contributors to the Oldest people articles alone. Thank you. --] (]) 21:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 22 December 2014
User:NickOrnstein
Another page in the same line as Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000 or Misplaced Pages:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nomination. Userpage contains information already available in Oldest people and List of supercentenarians from the United States. Possibly WP:NOTHERE as user doesn't appear to be doing much editing outside of their userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- ABSOULETLY, totally Keep - This is my page; I don't understand why that after SIX YEARS that all of a sudden a random nobody wants to shut my page down. I have had lists on my page for years. Aren't there more important issues to tackle, in regards to vandalizers to pages, besides my page that is absolutely no burden. This is NOT an article; no harm is being done to anybody except yourselves. TONS of other users from WikiProject: Oldest People have lists of the oldest people in the world on their page. I don't care about how high you rank (whether general or private) on Misplaced Pages; worry about yourself, pal. It is a website with information about older people, not a Hit List. Leave us fantastic contributors to the Oldest people articles alone. Thank you. --Nick Ornstein (talk) 21:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)