Misplaced Pages

WOT Services: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:21, 26 December 2014 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits These are certainly not valid concerns per Misplaced Pages's relevant polciies← Previous edit Revision as of 17:45, 26 December 2014 edit undoScrapIronIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,329 edits Yes, they are relevant. Please see the discussion page and NPOV NoticeboardNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

{{Multiple issues|
{{Primary sources|article|date=December 2014}}
{{Unbalanced|date=November 2014}} {{Unbalanced|date=November 2014}}
}}
{{Advert|date=December 2014}}
{{For|the cryptography term|Web of trust}} {{For|the cryptography term|Web of trust}}
{{Infobox company {{Infobox company

Revision as of 17:45, 26 December 2014

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "WOT Services" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. (November 2014)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. (December 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
For the cryptography term, see Web of trust.
WOT Services, Ltd.
IndustryInternet safety
FoundedJuly 2006
HeadquartersHelsinki, Finland
Websitewww.mywot.com

WOT Services, Ltd is a Finnish company that runs the partly crowdsourced Internet website reputation rating tool Web of Trust (WOT). The installed WOT browser add-on shows its users the reputations of websites, which are calculated through a combination of user ratings and data from other sources. To generate revenue WOT licenses the use of its reputation database to other businesses.

History

WOT was founded in 2006 by Sami Tolvanen and Timo Ala-Kleemola, who wrote the WOT software as post-graduates at the Tampere University of Technology in Finland. They launched the service officially in 2007, with serial entrepreneur and angel investor Esa Suurio as CEO. In November 2009 Suurio moved on to his next endeavor.

In 2009 MySQL founder Michael Widenius invested in WOT and became a member of the board of directors.

The company has partnered with Facebook, hpHosts, LegitScript, Mail.ru, Panda Security, Phishtank, GlobalSign and TRUSTe.

The rating tool

The WOT browser add-on does two things: (1) it sends user ratings to the WOT site, and (2) it displays the computed results via color-coded icons in the user's browser tool-bar and next to external links on the pages of leading search engines, email services and social network sites. The add-on source code is public.

According to the company information their program software is designed to compute the measure of trust the rating users have in websites, enhanced with data from a number of third-party sources. The user rating system claims to be meritocratic; the weight of ratings are algorithmically calculated for each user individually.

Reviews

The New York Times and the Washington Post made mention of WOT and the add-on was mentioned and reviewed by the trade press and download sites. The reviewers opinions vary from good to excellent, though some critical remarks were made.

PC Magazine's Neil Rubenking concluded "Web of Trust's protection is free, and it doesn't impact browsing speed; it's well worth trying out". However, on the minus side he found several clearly adult sites unrated and he wished WOT would also rate sponsored search results, like its main competitors do.

PC World's Preston Gralla concluded: "Try WOT (Web of Trust), an excellent--and free--browser add-on that offers protection", and Rick Broida wrote in an article "I also highly recommend Web of Trust, a free browser plug-in that shows you if Web links are safe--before you click them".

Maximum PC picked WOT as its 'Firefox Add-on of the Week'.

Softpedia reviewer Ionut Ilascu wrote: "The reliability of the service has grown in the past years, despite voices accusing it of being exactly the opposite of what it should be, and proof is the collaboration with Facebook, Opera and Mail.ru Group.", concluding "As a service, WOT (Web of Trust) may be viewed as biased, but the latest developments in balancing the user opinion in order to provide relevant information point to the contrary. The extension is non-obtrusive but still has room for improvements.".

See also

References

  1. Modine, Austin (17 February 2009). "The Register - MySQL daddy juices Finnish security firm". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  2. Widenius, Michael (16 February 2009). "Monty says - Life goes on and making the internet more secure with Web of Trust (WOT)". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  3. "Facebook Security - Keeping You Safe from Scams and Spam". 12 May 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  4. "Donna's SecurityFlash - Web of Trust (WOT) is now using hpHOSTS database". 6 July 2008. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  5. "LegitScript Blog - LegitScript, Web of Trust announce partnership". 13 May 2010. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  6. "Mail.Ru Group Launches New Browser Featuring Web of Trust Safe-Surfing Technology" (Press release). Rocket Science PR. 8 August 2012.
  7. Schaffhauser, Dian (11 August 2009). "The Journal - Panda Security, Against Intuition Offer Free 'Web of Trust' Browser Addon". Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  8. "Friends of PhishTank". Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  9. "GlobalSign - GlobalSign Partners with Web of Trust to Provide Reputation Data in the Website Passport". 15 March 2012. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  10. Richmond, Riva (19 May 2010). "New York Times - Five Ways to Keep Online Criminals at Bay". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  11. Krebs, Brian (29 July 2008). "Washington Post - Three Quarters of Malicious Web Sites Are Hacked". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  12. Bell, Melissa (13 May 2011). "Washington Post - After big news stories, watch out for social media viruses". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  13. Rubenking, Neil J. (Aug 13, 2009). "PC Magazine - Web of Trust Review and Rating". Retrieved 17 May 2011.
  14. Gralla, Preston (26 April 2009). "PCWorld - Say WOT? Web of Trust Rates Web Site Safety". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  15. Broida, Rick (4 January 2010). "PCWorld - Make Your New PC Hassle-Free, Part 3: Keep It Secure". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  16. Murphy, David (2 December 2009). "Maximum PC - Firefox Add-on of the Week: Web of Trust". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  17. Ilascu, Ionut (26 September 2013). "Softpedia - Web of Trust Review". Retrieved 21 December 2014.
Categories: