| Revision as of 16:19, 15 July 2006 editKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits →[]: Object← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:13, 15 July 2006 edit undoRagesoss (talk | contribs)Administrators21,501 edits →[]: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :* The "Alternative categorization schemes" box seems quite useless, but that might just be personal preference. | :* The "Alternative categorization schemes" box seems quite useless, but that might just be personal preference. | ||
| :Overall, though, quite good. ] 16:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | :Overall, though, quite good. ] 16:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--] 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:13, 15 July 2006
Portal:Biology
This portal has been around for a long time, receives regular updates, and has had a minor facelift and expansion recently with the addition of links to related portals and Mediawiki resources.
It's been a great portal for quite some time, but we've apparently never thought about nominating it, so here goes. Looking forward to your comments.
PS: Here is a version from February 2005, two weeks after it was created.
Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Object:
- Selected picture needs an image credit.
- No list of major topics.
- The "Alternative categorization schemes" box seems quite useless, but that might just be personal preference.
- Overall, though, quite good. Kirill Lokshin 16:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--ragesoss 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)