Revision as of 05:17, 31 December 2014 editBarrelProof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers106,998 edits Undid revision 640341793 by BarrelProof (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:00, 15 January 2015 edit undoSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,689 edits →Requested move 29 December 2014: support changing title, but not necessarily to what's been proposedNext edit → | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*::Guinness Book of World Records uses the hyphenated, which is why I asked.--] (]) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | *::Guinness Book of World Records uses the hyphenated, which is why I asked.--] (]) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
*:::I don't doubt that some sources hyphenate the noun. However, the hyphenation seems contrary to Misplaced Pages style conventions (and the general practice of writing in ordinary English). —] (]) 05:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC) | *:::I don't doubt that some sources hyphenate the noun. However, the hyphenation seems contrary to Misplaced Pages style conventions (and the general practice of writing in ordinary English). —] (]) 05:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
* '''Support''' per ] and per basic English usage rules. And no, this is not an ENGVAR matter. NB: Guinness is a brewery, with a department devoted to tracking stats and records to settle bar bets; they are not English-language style and grammar experts. And they're ]. Anyway, we should make sure that sources don't fully compound this as "polesitting"; many compound sport/game names are fused in this way, from the mid 20th century onward, especially when the root noun is not a sport/game by itself (or class thereof, in which the specific case is a division). Update: This N-gram demonstrates that the unhyphenated, two-word usage dominates, even without eliminating properly-hyphenated adjectival usage (i.e., even when giving massive benefit of the doubt to the hyphen). This is basically proof the article should move as proposed. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 11:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Asking the obvious == | == Asking the obvious == |
Revision as of 12:00, 15 January 2015
It is requested that an image or photograph of Pole sitting be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
Delete proposal
- Delete patent nonesense! Jschwa1 12:57, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- The above comment refers to a previous version of this page. Kappa 14:17, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Dates of fad
Why does the article say the fad started in 1924 when the Recent Additions page speaks of an 1842 occurence???
- Yes, and the article also mentions that a record was broken in 1930, but that the fad lasted from 1924 to 1929. Can this be fixed? Badagnani (talk) 06:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Record
According to numerous web pages, the record is held by Frank Perkins and is 399 days. http://www.trivia-library.com/b/biography-of-father-of-flagpole-sitting-saint-simeon-stylites-part-2.htm
Unfortunately this is confused by the fact that there is also an urban legend using Frank's name which states that he came down 8 hours shy of the previous record, and his girlfriend left him, and some other nonsense. Snopes says in their write-up about this urban legend that Frank Perkins is in fact the real record holder but the rest of the legend is false.
I wouldn't want to think poor Frank sat up on that pole for 399 days only to be forgotten! I don't know anything about editing wikipedia but if someone out there does, please confirm this information and add it. Thanks. 67.168.84.233 17:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
yes.
Cleanup Requested
"The gimmick he pioneered was ruined by people trying to cash in on his idea without being willing to take it all the way. Kelly died of a heart attack, penniless, on the street nearby the same movie theater at which he performed his first 13 day sit, clutching a binding of newspaper clippings from his time as the king of flagpole sitting. "
That is heavily biased. Whilst there does seem to be some useful information, it lacks objectivity. In addition, i have no idea what is going on with those square brackets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.160.250.14 (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed (by someone else). Maikel (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 29 December 2014
The request to rename this article to Pole sitting has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Pole-sitting → Pole sitting – The hyphen seems neither necessary nor appropriate. The current title seems contrary to WP:HYPHEN guidelines regarding hyphenation, as this is a compound noun rather than a compound modifier. See, for example, Tree sitting. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support – hyphen is inappropriate here. But notice usage when compound used as adjective: "pole-sittling champion", "pole-sitting record", "flag-pole sitting". Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Quesion Is this is case of WP:ENGVAR? a commpound word of this variety does fit the bill for British spelling.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I haven't heard of such a thing for British English. Can you find a couple of books that do it that way? Dicklyon (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Guinness Book of World Records uses the hyphenated, which is why I asked.--Labattblueboy (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't doubt that some sources hyphenate the noun. However, the hyphenation seems contrary to Misplaced Pages style conventions (and the general practice of writing in ordinary English). —BarrelProof (talk) 05:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Guinness Book of World Records uses the hyphenated, which is why I asked.--Labattblueboy (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I haven't heard of such a thing for British English. Can you find a couple of books that do it that way? Dicklyon (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support per MOS:HYPHEN and per basic English usage rules. And no, this is not an ENGVAR matter. NB: Guinness is a brewery, with a department devoted to tracking stats and records to settle bar bets; they are not English-language style and grammar experts. And they're not even British. Anyway, we should make sure that sources don't fully compound this as "polesitting"; many compound sport/game names are fused in this way, from the mid 20th century onward, especially when the root noun is not a sport/game by itself (or class thereof, in which the specific case is a division). Update: This N-gram demonstrates that the unhyphenated, two-word usage dominates, even without eliminating properly-hyphenated adjectival usage (i.e., even when giving massive benefit of the doubt to the hyphen). This is basically proof the article should move as proposed. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ⱷ҅ᴥⱷ≼ 11:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Asking the obvious
How did pole sitters go to the bathroom?– Gilliam (talk) 02:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories: