Revision as of 18:18, 31 December 2014 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →WP:ARBPIA alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:38, 2 January 2015 edit undoInayity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,681 edits →Warning regarding your edits to Israel Lobby: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | ||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Warning regarding your edits to Israel Lobby == | |||
'''If you check the talk page you should have seen this.''' | |||
WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES | |||
The article The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, along with other articles relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2008 Arbitration case, and supplemented by community consensus in November 2010. The current restrictions are: | |||
All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related. | |||
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. | |||
Editors who otherwise violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence. | |||
After being warned, discretionary sanctions can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions can include blocks for up to one year, topic-bans or further revert-restrictions. | |||
Reports of editors violating any of these restrictions should be made to either the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Violations of 1RR should be made to the edit warring noticeboards. | |||
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert! | |||
You are the only one editing against the talk page--] (]) 07:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:38, 2 January 2015
Welcome!
Hello, Baatarsaikan, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! : Noyster (talk), 11:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA alert
Please carefully read this information:The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Warning regarding your edits to Israel Lobby
If you check the talk page you should have seen this. WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES The article The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, along with other articles relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2008 Arbitration case, and supplemented by community consensus in November 2010. The current restrictions are:
All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related. Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. Editors who otherwise violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence. After being warned, discretionary sanctions can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions can include blocks for up to one year, topic-bans or further revert-restrictions. Reports of editors violating any of these restrictions should be made to either the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Violations of 1RR should be made to the edit warring noticeboards. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
You are the only one editing against the talk page--Inayity (talk) 07:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)