| Revision as of 19:49, 2 January 2015 editRebecca1990 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,967 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:52, 2 January 2015 edit undoРаціональне анархіст (talk | contribs)2,829 edits →Eva AngelinaNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep'''. Passes ] with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user . He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. ] ] (]) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Keep'''. Passes ] with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user . He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. ] ] (]) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::That's the second time you've made that accusation today, Rebecca. File it, or stop the personal attacks. I would also note that you appear to ] solely to promote and defend pornography articles, as it's and strong reasons exist to assume you're an industry insider in violation of ].--] (]) 20:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:52, 2 January 2015
Eva Angelina
- Eva Angelina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable porno actress; article is basically an AVN press-release (as most of these type articles are). Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - Multiple significant performer awards satisfies PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (failing PORNBIO).--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- 1 applies. The non-scene related ones as good enough to pass PORNBIO. Website of the year and Female Performer of the year do lift her out of the crowd. Dunno about best actress video but certainly this is someone who currently meets the required standard. Spartaz 11:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (failing PORNBIO).--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Easily satisfies criteria 1 of WP:PORNBIO. For the record those criteria don't have to be cumulatively met. One only needs to pass a single one, and she easily passes the main criterium as she has won multiple individual awards. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 16;26 CET
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user Redban. He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. Same user? Rebecca1990 (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- That's the second time you've made that accusation today, Rebecca. File it, or stop the personal attacks. I would also note that you appear to be here solely to promote and defend pornography articles, as it's 100% of your activity, and strong reasons exist to assume you're an industry insider in violation of Misplaced Pages:TOS.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)