Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Eva Angelina: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:20, 3 January 2015 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,025 edits Eva Angelina: keep← Previous edit Revision as of 06:10, 3 January 2015 edit undoРаціональне анархіст (talk | contribs)2,829 edits See noticeboard discussionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Speedy Keep'''. Passes ] with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user . He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. ] ] (]) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC) *'''Speedy Keep'''. Passes ] with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user . He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. ] ] (]) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
::That's the second time you've made that accusation today, Rebecca. File it, or stop the personal attacks. I would observe that you appear to ] solely to promote and defend pornography articles, as it's and so strong reasons exist to assume you're an industry insider in violation of ].--] (]) 20:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
:::In that case may I point out that your own contribution history looks pretty much like a single purpose account geared for deleting articles: the majority of all your edits pertains to AFD's. That's not exactly normal/standard behaviour either... especially for an account which is only active since a month and a half. -- ], 2 January 2015, 23:17 CET. :::In that case may I point out that your own contribution history looks pretty much like a single purpose account geared for deleting articles: the majority of all your edits pertains to AFD's. That's not exactly normal/standard behaviour either... especially for an account which is only active since a month and a half. -- ], 2 January 2015, 23:17 CET.
*'''Keep'''. Passes ] criterion 1 with an AVN Award for Best Actress and an XBIZ Award for Best Female Performer. ] (]) 02:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Passes ] criterion 1 with an AVN Award for Best Actress and an XBIZ Award for Best Female Performer. ] (]) 02:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:10, 3 January 2015

Eva Angelina

Eva Angelina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable porno actress; article is basically an AVN press-release (as most of these type articles are). Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (failing PORNBIO).--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  1. 1 applies. The non-scene related ones as good enough to pass PORNBIO. Website of the year and Female Performer of the year do lift her out of the crowd. Dunno about best actress video but certainly this is someone who currently meets the required standard. Spartaz 11:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Easily satisfies criteria 1 of WP:PORNBIO. For the record those criteria don't have to be cumulatively met. One only needs to pass a single one, and she easily passes the main criterium as she has won multiple individual awards. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 16;26 CET
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user Redban. He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. Same user? Rebecca1990 (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
That's the second time you've made that accusation today, Rebecca. File it, or stop the personal attacks. I would observe that you appear to be here solely to promote and defend pornography articles, as it's 100% of your activity, and so strong reasons exist to assume you're an industry insider in violation of Misplaced Pages:TOS.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
In that case may I point out that your own contribution history looks pretty much like a single purpose account geared for deleting articles: the majority of all your edits pertains to AFD's. That's not exactly normal/standard behaviour either... especially for an account which is only active since a month and a half. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 23:17 CET.
Categories: