Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:33, 16 July 2006

archive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgment, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in any way, that's fine. I'm a big girl who can take it. If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better.

Please don't delete discussion

I believe that's considered bad form here on Misplaced Pages. Especially when it's appropriate discussion like discussion of criticism of Misplaced Pages on the Talk:Criticism of Misplaced Pages page. Thanks in advance. -Advocron 16:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks and trolling are not discussion. As I alread explained to you that page is for discussion of the article not for you tp personoally rant and rave. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

"Welcome!"

Sorry, I knew you'd been here a while, the welcome notice was an accidental VandalProof click. I was trying to revert the vandalism to your page (notice my facetious "I'm a genius" edit comment when I finally did). Thanks for the help in dealing with the vandal. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and important note

Thank you for deleting YaR GnitS's personal attacks against me on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gay ICP. I personally don't mind when people attack me... they usually only make themselves look bad. But it's nice to see another editor taking action to keep things civil.  :) Kasreyn 21:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

NOTE: FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES OF User:YaR_GnitS

I see you've already blocked User:YaR_GnitS. However, you might not have noticed the worst of what he's done. He fraudulently altered User:Koosh's words from a delete vote to a keep vote, and deleted User:Rosicrucian's vote. Diff Would this justify a longer block in your opinion? As far as I can tell, User:YaR_GnitS is a vandalism / POV push account only. Kasreyn 22:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Well I tend to keeps blocks short in the first instance. If he comes back after a first block and disrupts again I'd be happy to indefinately block, but I'm hoping that 24 hours will be enough to teach him to bahave.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 22:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Research

Can you look at the history for deleted imagesImage:D hed shot.jpg & Image:Jobs Gates Mossberg 2005.jpg - if these were uploaded by User:Wmossberg they most likely were uploaded without understanding the license criteria. This user is Walter Mossberg and I will follow up with him to get permission to use these again. Also the history at Walt Mossberg should probably be merged with Walter Mossberg thx in adv --Trödel 22:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes they were. I'm a bit tired to do a merge right now but I'll take a look in the morning. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 22:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I could not have removed the warning myself. I am pretty sure I would have been blocked for vandalism if I did. Anyway, thx. Azmoc 13:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello Theresa knott, save for your effort to defuse the situation User:JzG's warning made sense in light of User:Azmoc's own warning placed on User:Zoe's user page. (→Netscott) 14:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

This too was a hot-headed warning. I wouldn't object if Zoe removed it, I have removed it myself. However, I was not uncivil, I was paraphrasing what Zoe said and using his/her argument as an example for my proposal. Azmoc 15:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Spelling

If I see you have a typo (like you do in the first section =D), can I correct it? I understand if you want me to leave them as is =P --mboverload@ 13:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do! I welcome anyone who wants to correct my terrible spellings. (See

Thanks

Cool heads prevail as ever. Well done. Just zis Guy you know? 15:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)