Revision as of 22:31, 8 January 2015 editRoyBoy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,646 edits archive 2012-2014, except one← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:20, 16 January 2015 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,137 edits →Your [] nomination of []: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page | Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page | ||
at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed." ] (]) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed." ] (]) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:20, 16 January 2015
| ||||
|
What the heck is this gonna do? RoyBoy 05:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Trust, but verify
Trust, but verify is old (but still solid) advice. Just a light-hearted link to a quirky little article. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again, wow that was messed up. Did we just post to each other's talk pages in the same minute about different things? Freaky. - RoyBoy 18:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like it. Certainly I got your notice by saving this page and got a laugh when I saw who was pinging me. Happy editing. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Abortion: "Art, literature and film"
Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed." KatieHepPal (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Abortion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abortion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlanZhu314159265358979 -- AlanZhu314159265358979 (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)