| Revision as of 06:20, 16 January 2015 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,586 edits →Your [] nomination of []: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:35, 11 February 2015 edit undo202.155.205.54 (talk) →Saipan Colonial Period Names: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | == Your ] nomination of ]== | ||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Saipan Colonial Period Names == | |||
| Dear RoyBoy, please consider: | |||
| The period when Saipan was controlled by the Spanish is called the Spanish colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Germans is called the German colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Japanese is called the Japanese colonial period. | |||
| but... | |||
| The period when Saipan was controlled by the US is NOT called the US colonial period. | |||
| Is uniformity of descriptions not a goal of Misplaced Pages? Is Misplaced Pages aiming at truth, or simply a mouthpiece for the colonial masters? | |||
| Thanks! | |||
Revision as of 05:35, 11 February 2015
| ||||
|
What the heck is this gonna do? RoyBoy 05:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Trust, but verify
Trust, but verify is old (but still solid) advice. Just a light-hearted link to a quirky little article. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again, wow that was messed up. Did we just post to each other's talk pages in the same minute about different things? Freaky. - RoyBoy 18:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like it. Certainly I got your notice by saving this page and got a laugh when I saw who was pinging me. Happy editing. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Abortion: "Art, literature and film"
Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed." KatieHepPal (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Abortion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abortion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlanZhu314159265358979 -- AlanZhu314159265358979 (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Saipan Colonial Period Names
Dear RoyBoy, please consider:
The period when Saipan was controlled by the Spanish is called the Spanish colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Germans is called the German colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Japanese is called the Japanese colonial period.
but...
The period when Saipan was controlled by the US is NOT called the US colonial period.
Is uniformity of descriptions not a goal of Misplaced Pages? Is Misplaced Pages aiming at truth, or simply a mouthpiece for the colonial masters?
Thanks!