Misplaced Pages

L.A. Confidentiel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:32, 17 July 2006 editSocafan (talk | contribs)1,024 edits circumstantial evidence to support its claim that he may have used performance-enhancing drugs, WADA rejects UCI's findings← Previous edit Revision as of 16:33, 17 July 2006 edit undoSocafan (talk | contribs)1,024 edits neutral wordingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''David Walsh''' is a ] sports reporter of the ] ]. In 2001 he revealed that ] was treated by ] who was ruled guilty of sports abuse. In 2004, Walsh published the book ] together with French reporter ] about alleged drug abuse by Armstrong. It contains allegations by Armstrong's former ] ] and according to the Guardian "circumstantial evidence to support its claim that he may have used performance-enhancing drugs".<ref></ref> '''David Walsh''' is a ] sports reporter of the ] ]. In 2001 he revealed that ] was treated by ] who was ruled guilty of sports abuse. In 2004, Walsh published the book ] together with French reporter ] about alleged drug abuse by Armstrong. It contains allegations by Armstrong's former ] ] and according to the Guardian "circumstantial evidence to support its claim that he may have used performance-enhancing drugs".<ref></ref>


Walsh wrote about the book in the Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong successfully sued the Sunday Times.<ref></ref> Cases for defamation against Walsh and co-author Ballenger are still pending.<ref></ref> Armstrong has been cleared by all drug tests and by an official ] inquiry.<ref></ref> The ] (WADA) rejects UCI's findings about Armstrong's alleged drug abuse. <ref></ref> Walsh wrote about the book in the Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong successfully sued the Sunday Times.<ref></ref> Cases for defamation against Walsh and co-author Ballenger are still pending.<ref></ref> A ] inquiry rejected claims about positive doing samples by Armstrong.<ref></ref> The ] (WADA) rejects UCI's findings about Armstrong's alleged drug abuse. <ref></ref>


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 16:33, 17 July 2006

David Walsh is a British sports reporter of the London Sunday Times. In 2001 he revealed that Lance Armstrong was treated by Michele Ferrari who was ruled guilty of sports abuse. In 2004, Walsh published the book LA confidential - The Secrets of Lance Armstrong together with French reporter Pierre Ballester about alleged drug abuse by Armstrong. It contains allegations by Armstrong's former masseuse Emma O'Reilly and according to the Guardian "circumstantial evidence to support its claim that he may have used performance-enhancing drugs".

Walsh wrote about the book in the Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong successfully sued the Sunday Times. Cases for defamation against Walsh and co-author Ballenger are still pending. A UCI inquiry rejected claims about positive doing samples by Armstrong. The World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) rejects UCI's findings about Armstrong's alleged drug abuse.

References

  1. The Guardian
  2. The Guardian
  3. The Guardian
  4. VeloNews
Stub icon

This article about a British journalist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Category: