Revision as of 01:52, 22 January 2015 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,803 edits →Friendly warning about DS at Emerson: read it again← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:54, 22 January 2015 edit undoCoffeepusher (talk | contribs)7,488 edits →Friendly warning about DS at Emerson: 4th paragraph, 25th wordNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:In this case, I have read the source about Islamophobia closer than you have. Cheers! ] (]) 01:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | :In this case, I have read the source about Islamophobia closer than you have. Cheers! ] (]) 01:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::The source that was cited said nothing about Islamophobia - it wasn't even a term back then. Read it again. <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.1em 0.1em 0.4em,#F2CEF2 -0.4em -0.4em 0.6em,#90EE90 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#E6FFFF"><b>]</b></font><font color="gold">☯</font>] 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | ::The source that was cited said nothing about Islamophobia - it wasn't even a term back then. Read it again. <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.1em 0.1em 0.4em,#F2CEF2 -0.4em -0.4em 0.6em,#90EE90 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#E6FFFF"><b>]</b></font><font color="gold">☯</font>] 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::I did, Cheers! ] (]) 01:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:54, 22 January 2015
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Personal reference
Welcome!
Hello, Coffeepusher, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello Coffeepusher. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Misplaced Pages to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
You should read this helpful list
See Timbo's Rule 14 User:Carrite#Timbo's_Rules Atsme☯ 02:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Friendly warning about DS at Emerson
Before you go reverting BLP violations - you need to recheck those sources. I will file an AE - not what you want. This unsourced/poorly sourced attack on Emerson has to stop. Atsme☯ 01:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- In this case, I have read the source about Islamophobia closer than you have. Cheers! Coffeepusher (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The source that was cited said nothing about Islamophobia - it wasn't even a term back then. Read it again. Atsme☯ 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I did, 4th paragraph, 25th word. Cheers! Coffeepusher (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The source that was cited said nothing about Islamophobia - it wasn't even a term back then. Read it again. Atsme☯ 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)