| Revision as of 20:27, 1 February 2015 editAshtul (talk | contribs)1,008 edits →breaking of topic ban.← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:34, 9 February 2015 edit undoAshtul (talk | contribs)1,008 edits →breaking of topic ban.Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| *I was seriously considering lifting the topic ban, but you've violated it twice today alone. Sure, adding geographical and similar content to articles about towns in Israel would not be covered by the topic ban, because the topic ban is from the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than anything that concerns only Israel or only Palestine/Arabia, but the ] article clearly ''is'' covered by the topic ban, as is all of the content you added . I'm afraid I've blocked you for a fortnight for the violations. That's longer than normal for a first topic-ban violation because of the length of your previous block, but that itself was longer than I would have thought necessary so if you ask me in a week I'll consider lifting the block. If you demonstrate for a few weeks after that that you can stick to the topic ban, I'll reconsider lifting that as well. ] | ] 17:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | *I was seriously considering lifting the topic ban, but you've violated it twice today alone. Sure, adding geographical and similar content to articles about towns in Israel would not be covered by the topic ban, because the topic ban is from the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than anything that concerns only Israel or only Palestine/Arabia, but the ] article clearly ''is'' covered by the topic ban, as is all of the content you added . I'm afraid I've blocked you for a fortnight for the violations. That's longer than normal for a first topic-ban violation because of the length of your previous block, but that itself was longer than I would have thought necessary so if you ask me in a week I'll consider lifting the block. If you demonstrate for a few weeks after that that you can stick to the topic ban, I'll reconsider lifting that as well. ] | ] 17:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :: All of these are about geographical points. Nothing to do with important history or current event. |
:: All of these are about geographical points. Nothing to do with important history or current event.] (]) 20:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::: ], you keep me blocked while Nishidani keeps doing the exact same thoughtful vandalism I complained about. edit of ] is another example of his slow, yet systematic (like you could see from the numerous examples I have given) obliteration of pages about settlement. ] was written in the page when it was created about 8 years ago but Mr. Nishidani ]. He has nothing to base his deletion on as a quick ] give over 1,000 results, one even from Nishidani ], . | |||
| ::: I was blamed my complaint was about retaliation but here is just another fresh example of his ] editing, which I cannot see how can ever be justified. I was never called stupid but I still cannot see how can this be regarded as content disputes. ] (]) 08:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Google books == | == Google books == | ||
Revision as of 08:34, 9 February 2015
 Archives |
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahane Yehuda Market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TimeOut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
breaking of topic ban.
You received a topic ban from Israel/Palestine area on the 27th of January, logged Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/Log/2015#Palestine-Israel_articles. User:HJ Mitchell said he would think about it; he didn´t promise to undo it. In spite of this, nearly all your edits since that day have been violations of your topic ban, please stop. Huldra (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Which one edit disturb you? None of them touched on Israel-Palestine issues. They were geographical or about towns inside pre-1967 Israel. Ashtul (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sigh, the topic ban is broadly constructed, just stay away from articles on Israel /Palestine. Touching articles like Acre Prison break is clearly forbidden. And then this and this .....in view of this from the same IP? Seriously, Huldra (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Acre Prison break came up when I editted Shavei Tzion so I added it. I will not use IP anymore. Ashtul (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was seriously considering lifting the topic ban, but you've violated it twice today alone. Sure, adding geographical and similar content to articles about towns in Israel would not be covered by the topic ban, because the topic ban is from the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than anything that concerns only Israel or only Palestine/Arabia, but the Acre Prison break article clearly is covered by the topic ban, as is all of the content you added here. I'm afraid I've blocked you for a fortnight for the violations. That's longer than normal for a first topic-ban violation because of the length of your previous block, but that itself was longer than I would have thought necessary so if you ask me in a week I'll consider lifting the block. If you demonstrate for a few weeks after that that you can stick to the topic ban, I'll reconsider lifting that as well. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- All of these are about geographical points. Nothing to do with important history or current event.Ashtul (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell, you keep me blocked while Nishidani keeps doing the exact same thoughtful vandalism I complained about. This edit of Karmei Tzur is another example of his slow, yet systematic (like you could see from the numerous examples I have given) obliteration of pages about settlement. Communal Settlement was written in the page when it was created about 8 years ago but Mr. Nishidani WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. He has nothing to base his deletion on as a quick give over 1,000 results, one even from Nishidani WP:RS, jfjfp.
- I was blamed my complaint was about retaliation but here is just another fresh example of his WP:TENDENTIOUS editing, which I cannot see how can ever be justified. I was never called stupid but I still cannot see how can this be regarded as content disputes. Ashtul (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Google books
I see many references from Google book but many of them do not me see the page referenced. What am I missing? Ashtul (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Often google-books let you see some of the book, but not all. It depends on geography and time: two people accessing in say, Spain and the US at the same time, might have access to different pages. And the pages you cannot access today, you might have access to tomorrow. If you look at User:Huldra/Sources: I spend quite a bit of time finding which google-ref had "preview", and which had not. And added then link to the one with preview. Huldra (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)