Misplaced Pages

User talk:Teflon Peter Christ: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:26, 2 February 2015 editLapadite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,378 edits Behavior: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 13:55, 2 February 2015 edit undoTeflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers140,333 edits Undid revision 645282928 by Lapadite77; WP:BOOMERANGNext edit →
Line 58: Line 58:
==]== ==]==
Hey Dan! Wanted to ask you to take a look at the critical reception of this album, and eventually expand it. It's a shame for a featured article to have so tiny section when plenty of reviews are available. Thanks in advance and happy holidays.--] (]) 11:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Hey Dan! Wanted to ask you to take a look at the critical reception of this album, and eventually expand it. It's a shame for a featured article to have so tiny section when plenty of reviews are available. Thanks in advance and happy holidays.--] (]) 11:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

== Behavior ==

Dan, I advise you to stop your ] behavior and recent multiple violations of ]. I did not canvass those two editors, not in the purpose or the nature of my request; and evidently, the one that opined has 0 bias, unlike what you've exhibited. If you continue with this disruptive train of behavior there are relevant noticeboards to take it to and with considerable recent evidence. Whether you delete this message or not, for the record, you've been warned here and elsewhere. Unlike you (per what you've exhibited), I'm here today ''only'' to improve Misplaced Pages articles, '']'' with other editors - not to push my biases, force a point, disrupt it or other editors, hold grudges, or engage/promote ]. Please start working collaboratively with others. Thanks. ] (]) 09:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:55, 2 February 2015

Status: Unknown

Main Page appearance: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band

This is a note to let the main editors of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 21, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/June 21, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Beatles

Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band is the eighth studio album by the English rock band the Beatles (pictured). Released on 1 June 1967, it was an immediate commercial and critical success. After the group retired from touring, Paul McCartney had an idea for a song involving an Edwardian era military band, and this developed into a plan to release an entire album as a performance by the fictional Sgt. Pepper band. Knowing they would not have to perform the tracks live, the Beatles adopted an experimental approach to composition, writing songs such as "With a Little Help from My Friends", "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" and "A Day in the Life". The producer George Martin's innovative recording of the album included the liberal application of signal processing. The cover, depicting the band in front of a collage of celebrities and historical figures, was designed by the English pop artists Peter Blake and Jann Haworth. One of the best-selling albums of all time, Sgt. Pepper is regarded as an important work of British psychedelia and an early concept album. One music scholar has described it as "the most important and influential rock and roll album ever recorded". (Full article...)

You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently. Nominators no longer need to calculate how many "points" an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates based on those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating another article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. Thank you. UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neo soul

The article Neo soul you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Neo soul for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 06:22, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

You've been awarded!

The WikiProject Albums Barnstar
Congratulations on your 49th good article and well done in improving numerous albums from the neo soul genre. The Misplaced Pages community is grateful for your contributions to the music field. Retrohead (talk) 09:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

MM

Precious again, "your" music on the Main page Marquee Moon, following the lonely hearts ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

AN/I

You haven't been directly involved other than to issue previous warnings, but there is a thread on ANI relating to your earlier complaints : 108.81.128.153 and genre warring. Ritchie333 10:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Today's Featured Article: Notification

This is to inform you that Song of Innocence, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 7 January 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. I have not scheduled an image; the lead image is copyright, the Blake image might misinform as to the nature of the article, and the other image within the article is tangential. Please let me know if you have other suggestions. Brianboulton (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Brianboulton (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

I had to squeeze the text down to about 1200 characters; was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 21:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
I wasn't too concerned about it to begin with lol. I trust your judgment. Dan56 (talk) 05:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks :) - Dank (push to talk) 05:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your AIV Report

Consider taking it to WP:AN3, AIV isn't really the right venue. NativeForeigner 08:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

I find myself having to make this same request of you again today. SQL 11:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for improving Misplaced Pages by contributing so many high quality music articles. Your work does not go unnoticed, and your time is appreciated. Keep up the great work, and happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 05:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The Beatles Invite

Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Misplaced Pages? Please feel free to join us.
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
Todo list:

To-do list for User:Teflon Peter Christ:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:


If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.

Body Count (album)

Hey Dan! Wanted to ask you to take a look at the critical reception of this album, and eventually expand it. It's a shame for a featured article to have so tiny section when plenty of reviews are available. Thanks in advance and happy holidays.--Retrohead (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)