| Revision as of 20:47, 9 February 2015 edit5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: findings, IP blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:30, 10 February 2015 edit undoMike V (talk | contribs)28,285 edits Marking case as closedNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| =====<big>09 February 2015</big>===== | =====<big>09 February 2015</big>===== | ||
| {{SPI case status|}} | {{SPI case status|close}} | ||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | ;Suspected sockpuppets | ||
Revision as of 00:30, 10 February 2015
RoniA20
RoniA20 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/RoniA20/Archive.
09 February 2015
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 132.64.215.145 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
213.57.144.175 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was blocked for WP:COPYRIGHT violations following the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Copyright_violations_by_IP_on_Israel.2C_Palestine.2C_and_the_United_Nations. RoniA20 responded admitting to being the IP and was blocked for block evasion. Now the user is back socking with 132.64.215.145 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Both IPs geolocate to Israel ( vs ). Compare for example vs . TDL (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Give me a minute, I blocked the user yesterday so I'll have a look into the IPs as I know a bit about the socking.--5 albert square (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I have now had the chance to look into this. As this is an IP there isn't much CheckUser can do so this needs to be based solely on behaviour. I've looked at the behaviour and
Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Original account has had their block upped to a month with a stern warning about to be put on their talk page that if they do this again then the next block will be indefinite. 
IP blocked, everything tagged, this can probably be closed now.--5 albert square (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I have now had the chance to look into this. As this is an IP there isn't much CheckUser can do so this needs to be based solely on behaviour. I've looked at the behaviour and
Categories: