| Revision as of 18:18, 19 July 2006 editAnville (talk | contribs)6,887 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:07, 23 July 2006 edit undoCrzrussian (talk | contribs)24,747 edits →[]: close, deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete''' - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 05:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| :''] was nominated for deletion on ]. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see ].'' | :''] was nominated for deletion on ]. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see ].'' | ||
| Line 7: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Delete''': this doesn't seem to be an encyclopaedic. ] 17:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': this doesn't seem to be an encyclopaedic. ] 17:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. It's a jumble of uncoordinated ideas with vanishingly small encyclopaedic content. ] 18:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. It's a jumble of uncoordinated ideas with vanishingly small encyclopaedic content. ] 18:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 05:07, 23 July 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Psychotronics
- Psychotronics was nominated for deletion on 2004-12-31. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Psychotronics.
IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- Writtenonsand 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. Artw
- Keep based on previous vote for keep, even if only for historical reasons Antares33712 14:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It needs watching to keep people from turning it into a promotion of the ideas involved, but I don't agree that it cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: this doesn't seem to be an encyclopaedic. Byrgenwulf 17:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a jumble of uncoordinated ideas with vanishingly small encyclopaedic content. Anville 18:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.