Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jb 007clone: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:23, 15 February 2015 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,882 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:12, 15 February 2015 edit undoJb 007clone (talk | contribs)297 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


'''Update:''' Damn, it feels so good to be vindicated :) ] (]) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC) '''Update:''' Damn, it feels so good to be vindicated :) ] (]) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
:*Still feeling vindicated by something that isn't there? - ] (]) 22:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


A friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being. ] ] 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC) A friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being. ] ] 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:12, 15 February 2015

The Kingsman

Update: Damn, it feels so good to be vindicated :) Jb 007clone (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

A friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Do I have a choice otherwise? Jb 007clone (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

You have multiple choices. You've initially chosen to engage in an edit war (as did the other editor, and I warned them as well). You can choose to stay on the talk page, with the page reverted back to its original state, until a consensus is arrived at. Or, you could choose to engage in the edit war some more, and risk being blocked. I hope it's the former and not the latter though. As the latter means you cannot continue to discuss your reasoning for including the gag in the article until the block is up.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
So the choice is talk page or blocked? Doesn't seem like much of a 'choice', does it? Don't worry, I won't revert the page anymore. Jb 007clone (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)