| Revision as of 23:44, 17 February 2015 editSonicyouth86 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,527 edits →Alert of standard discretionary sanctions: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:56, 17 February 2015 edit undoApples grow on pines (talk | contribs)436 edits CleanupNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:EStabPrn.gif listed for deletion == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> -- ]]. 17:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == GamerGate notice == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ].<br>The details of these sanctions are described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 12:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry about that == | |||
| My mistake on the unsigned template, didn't mean to put it right in the middle of you comment. Thanks for fixing it. — ] (]) 21:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not a problem! ] (]) 21:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Personal attack== | |||
| I do not appreciate your false assertion that I ": added anything to the closed discussion; I was attempting to correct the disruption caused by you and the other editors there. Please retract your false assertion immediately. ] <small>]</small> 02:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Just to be clear. ] are disruptive and violate the GamerGate General sanctions mentioned in ]. ] <small>]</small> 02:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm sorry, but the assertion is not false. You closed a discussion, after which I posted a proposed edit, not having noticed that you closed the discussion. You will note that this happened to another editor, too, and you've treated us in very different ways. My edit was moved up to the "closed" discussion, as if it didn't deserve consideration, while the other was moved to a separate thread. You have done this without notifying me in any way, in a manner that could be described as stealthy, or, indeed, sneaky. | |||
| ::I apologise for the tone of my message, but I do believe that your behaviour was unacceptable, and would appreciate an apology in return. ] (]) 02:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::To further clarify, from ]: ''Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki.'' | |||
| :::The evidence to be considered is the edit history of the page in question, which clearly outlines the order of events and your response to both suggestions: ] (]) 02:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::To clarify even further, this "" is the offending edit. Would you not agree that calling a major edition like this something more specific than "fix" would have helped establish your good will? ] (]) 02:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::There was nothing "sneaky" about it, I was very clear in my edits as an uninvolved administrator that I was "fixing" the additional discussion by placing it under the archive. Your edit to the archived section was inappropriate and disruptive.But no problem, I won't ask you again - I'll let it stand as is. ] <small>]</small> 03:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Okay. I've edited my assertion to include direct evidence of your sneaky behaviour. That way everyone can make up their own mind about it. Of course, we also both know that you were directly involved moments before closing it, but, again, the edit history reflects that sufficiently. As neither of us seem to feel this warrants further action, I will consider this matter closed. ] (]) 03:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I'm referring to 'involved' as in ]; I was in process of moving legitimate discussion about sources and content to a new section - none of this was 'sneaky'. Please feel free to pursue this at ] if you believe I've acted inappropriately, otherwise I consider myself uninvolved and will continue acting in an administrative capacity on GamerGate related articles. ] <small>]</small> 03:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::As I said, I feel this warrants no further action. Your behaviour has been pointed out to you, which will hopefully be enough. I'd appreciate it if we could part our ways now (outside of your administrative duties, of course), as it is clear we will not reach an agreement and this discussion does not stand a chance at becoming productive. ] (]) 03:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *I've hatted your inappropriate discussion of another editor's behavior, discussing other editors on article talk pages is inappropriate per ], ] and ]. Instead, ] should be followed. ] <small>]</small> 03:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okay. I hope you got your kicks out of that. Can you leave me alone now, please? ] (]) 03:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Alert of standard discretionary sanctions == | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --] (]) 23:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC) | |||