User talk:Thargor Orlando: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:19, 21 February 2015 editTheRealVordox (talk \| contribs)84 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:36, 21 February 2015 edit undoTheRealVordox (talk \| contribs)84 edits →GamerGate sources Next edit →
Line 108:		Line 108:

	I saw you were called for sources in the discussion of getting gamergate to a more objective standpoint, as such there's been a few people gathering information and sources of Gamergate movement(Or controversy). We've compiled quite a list of Gamergate based on the WP:RS, however Masem's quote in the lower reply to the post does make a valid point, if followed.		I saw you were called for sources in the discussion of getting gamergate to a more objective standpoint, as such there's been a few people gathering information and sources of Gamergate movement(Or controversy). We've compiled quite a list of Gamergate based on the WP:RS, however Masem's quote in the lower reply to the post does make a valid point, if followed.
	This has quite a few sources from various months back may be of use, I contacted Sordel as well about this, since I am unable to post anywhere on the talk on the Gamergate article.		This has quite a few sources from various months back may be of use, I contacted Sordel as well about this, since I am unable to post anywhere on the talk on the Gamergate article. There's also a few links to Masem's talk of various ideas and such below that reply.

	I wish you the best, it's still a mess, and this is just a question if it may help out with getting the article objective. If it's deemed unreliable sources, then please do no make use of them. I would not want you to get a sanction due to this. If it does get troublesome you can lay the blame on me. ] (]) 19:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)		I wish you the best, it's still a mess, and this is just a question if it may help out with getting the article objective. If it's deemed unreliable sources, then please do no make use of them. I would not want you to get a sanction due to this. If it does get troublesome you can lay the blame on me. Don't take a chance on that, please. ] (]) 19:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:36, 21 February 2015

Generally around, I think

If I leave you a message at your talk page or at the talk of an article, I have it watchlisted and will look for replies there. No need to leave talkback messages here, but using the talkback function on those pages is appreciated and encouraged.

Furthermore, if you're coming here to talk to me about a content dispute, your best bet is to raise it at the talk page of the article(s) in question. If you leave a message pertaining directly to a content dispute, I am likely to simply tell you to bring it to talk anyway, so let's both save a step. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Weeknd

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Weeknd. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ag-gag

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ag-gag. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Please comment on Talk:Michael Grimm (politician)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Grimm (politician). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Please comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Please comment on Talk:Human rights in Northern Cyprus

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human rights in Northern Cyprus. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Moving my hat

That final comment probably the most ridiculous thing about this yet. For shame. Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

If you're going to move a hat to cover another comment please re-sign it yourself. I have no issue with Mark's comment and he mistakenly (and reasonably) thought that my comment was directed at him. — Strongjam (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Probably shouldn't have hatted it at all, but it looks resolved now. Thargor Orlando (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Here was me going to start a new section for this, but seeing as we already have a section... Thagor, if somebody else hats something (as Dreadstar did) they're probably fairly sure of what they wanted to hat. If you disagree, at least re-sign it yourself- it can seem unethical to expand the purview of a hat without claiming responsibility. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

It seems like I was acting under what the hat was intended to do. I left a note at his page to tell him I did it, and said no problem if he disagreed. How about, instead of coming here and preaching to me, going to the talk page of the person fanning the flames and getting them to stop disrupting what has otherwise been a civil talk page in his absence? Thargor Orlando (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

The issue is not what you were inflamed by, but that you were inflamed by it. In the future, take more time thinking about your comments and how they contribute to the encyclopedia before making them. Cheers! PeterTheFourth (talk) 00:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please comment on Talk:Army Ranger Wing

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Army Ranger Wing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Peterson Institute

Thanks. I've been waiting for page protection with the hopes that it will "educate" the IPs. But the backlog is considerable. I think PP is a better course of action (at present) than bringing their edits to the ANI or Edit War boards. – S. Rich (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep calm and carry on

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Have this from me. You deserve it. Meşteşugarul - U 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Z147

Please comment on Talk:Israel

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

Please comment on File talk:World marriage-equality laws.svg

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:World marriage-equality laws.svg. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

1RR violation?

Hi, Thargor, sorry if you'd rather I not ask this here. Feel free to revert if so. Does this edit removing your coverage of PAX's response not put this user over 1RR, given that they also reverted here about 7 hours ago? It seems so to me, but I thought you'd know better. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 21:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

No need to remove, it's a good question. I looked, and removing my edit definitely doesn't revert it to a previous form in my mind, as he left the rest of the direct quote in place. Definitely doesn't violate the letter, but certainly the spirit. I won't be pursuing it, and he'll likely dig his own grave, but if you think you have a case, I could be wrong. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

GamerGate sources

God Day Thargor.

I saw you were called for sources in the discussion of getting gamergate to a more objective standpoint, as such there's been a few people gathering information and sources of Gamergate movement(Or controversy). We've compiled quite a list of Gamergate based on the WP:RS, however Masem's quote in the lower reply to the post does make a valid point, if followed. This link has quite a few sources from various months back may be of use, I contacted Sordel as well about this, since I am unable to post anywhere on the talk on the Gamergate article. There's also a few links to Masem's talk of various ideas and such below that reply.

I wish you the best, it's still a mess, and this is just a question if it may help out with getting the article objective. If it's deemed unreliable sources, then please do no make use of them. I would not want you to get a sanction due to this. If it does get troublesome you can lay the blame on me. Don't take a chance on that, please. TheRealVordox (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)