| Revision as of 15:40, 25 February 2015 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits change your socks every week!← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:42, 25 February 2015 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits knee-length, athletic, dress, work....Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Please delete the <nowiki>{{multiple|...}}</nowiki> template when you delete a tag leaving only a single tag remaining. ] (]) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | Please delete the <nowiki>{{multiple|...}}</nowiki> template when you delete a tag leaving only a single tag remaining. ] (]) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : Bot work. Bots fix this automatically, that's what they're for. (But you knew this anyway, didn't you?) Now, if only bots could read articles, we wouldn't have thousands of biographies lingering between alive and dead. --] (]) 15:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ===Reverting the deletion of a PROD=== | ===Reverting the deletion of a PROD=== | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 25 February 2015
This is a user talk page
February 2015
Multiple tags at heads of articles
If you are not going to edit correctly, then it would be better for the project if you did not edit it at all.
& Please use the {{multiple|...}} template when you add a tag that results in multiple issues.
Please delete the {{multiple|...}} template when you delete a tag leaving only a single tag remaining. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Bot work. Bots fix this automatically, that's what they're for. (But you knew this anyway, didn't you?) Now, if only bots could read articles, we wouldn't have thousands of biographies lingering between alive and dead. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Reverting the deletion of a PROD
With regard to this edit: , you are not permitted to revert the deletion of a PROD, regardless of who challenged it. You must use WP:AFD once the PROD is challenged. As this was yet another unwarranted revert of an IP address editor, I have added the revert to the now running list of such reversions of IP address editor's contributions. This list has been initiated to be used as the evidence in an ANI case once there are enough of them. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh my. You mean any random IP logging in from the Spratly Island can take off a tag and we have no power to fix the vandalism? Glad to see you've taken up the thermos and Maglight; your Andy and Guy personae can't take up the whole burden themselves. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)