Misplaced Pages

Maggot therapy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:27, 2 March 2015 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Tales and early history: remove copyvio from http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=50f_1239324602← Previous edit Revision as of 12:28, 2 March 2015 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Case studies and modern use: remove WP:ORNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:
===Tales and early history=== ===Tales and early history===
Written records have documented that maggots have been used since ] as a wound treatment.<ref name="pmid17551073">{{cite journal|author=Whitaker IS, Twine C, Whitaker MJ, Welck M, Brown CS, Shandall A|title=Larval therapy from antiquity to the present day: mechanisms of action, clinical applications and future potential|journal=Postgraduate Medical Journal|volume=83|issue=980|pages=409–13|year=2007|pmid=17551073|doi=10.1136/pgmj.2006.055905|pmc=2600045}}</ref> There are reports of the use of maggots for ] healing by ] Native Americans and ] tribes in Australia. There also have been reports of the use of maggot treatment in ] times. Military physicians have observed that soldiers whose wounds had become colonized with maggots experienced significantly less morbidity and mortality than soldiers whose wounds had not become colonized. These physicians included ]’s general surgeon, Baron ]. Larrey reported during France's Egyptian campaign in Syria, 1798–1801, that certain species of fly consumed only dead tissue and helped wounds to heal.<ref name="pmid10761570">{{cite journal|author=Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S|title=Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions|journal=Annu. Rev. Entomol.|volume=45|pages=55–81|year=2000|pmid=10761570|doi=10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55}}</ref> Written records have documented that maggots have been used since ] as a wound treatment.<ref name="pmid17551073">{{cite journal|author=Whitaker IS, Twine C, Whitaker MJ, Welck M, Brown CS, Shandall A|title=Larval therapy from antiquity to the present day: mechanisms of action, clinical applications and future potential|journal=Postgraduate Medical Journal|volume=83|issue=980|pages=409–13|year=2007|pmid=17551073|doi=10.1136/pgmj.2006.055905|pmc=2600045}}</ref> There are reports of the use of maggots for ] healing by ] Native Americans and ] tribes in Australia. There also have been reports of the use of maggot treatment in ] times. Military physicians have observed that soldiers whose wounds had become colonized with maggots experienced significantly less morbidity and mortality than soldiers whose wounds had not become colonized. These physicians included ]’s general surgeon, Baron ]. Larrey reported during France's Egyptian campaign in Syria, 1798–1801, that certain species of fly consumed only dead tissue and helped wounds to heal.<ref name="pmid10761570">{{cite journal|author=Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S|title=Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions|journal=Annu. Rev. Entomol.|volume=45|pages=55–81|year=2000|pmid=10761570|doi=10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55}}</ref>

===Case studies and modern use===
While at ] in 1929, Dr. Baer introduced maggots into 21 patients with intractable chronic ]. He observed rapid debridement, reductions in the number of pathogenic organisms, reduced odor levels, ] of wound beds, and ideal rates of healing. All 21 patients' open lesions were completely healed and they were released from the hospital after two months of maggot therapy.

After the publication of Dr. Baer's results in 1931,<ref>'''Baer''', W. S. (1931): The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with the maggot (larvae of the blowfly). ''Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery'' '''13''': 438–475.</ref> maggot therapy for wound care became very common, particularly in the United States. The Lederle pharmaceutical company commercially produced "Surgical Maggots", larvae of the ], which primarily feed on the ] (dead) tissue of the living host without attacking living tissue. Between 1930 and 1940, more than 100 medical papers were published on maggot therapy. Medical literature of this time contains many references to the successful use of maggots in chronic or infected wounds including ], abscesses, burns, sub-acute ],<ref>'''Hewitt''', F. (1932): Osteomyelitis; Development of the use of maggots in treatment. ''American Journal of Nursing'' '''32''': 31-38.</ref><ref>'''McKeever''', D. C. (1933): Maggots in treatment of osteomyelitis: A simple inexpensive method. ''Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery'' '''15''': 85–93.</ref> and chronic ].<ref>] (1935): A case of chronic thoracic empyema treated with maggots. ''Can Med Assoc J'' ''32'': :301–302. (Cited at )</ref>

More than three hundred American hospitals employed maggot therapy during the 1940s. The extensive use of maggot therapy prior to World War II was curtailed when the discovery and growing use of ] caused it to be deemed outdated. Due to the lack of conventional medicines, maggot therapy was used by Allied military medical staff in Japanese prisoner of war camps in the Far East throughout World War II.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20070928212353/www.zoobiotic.org/maggots-in-wartime/</ref>

'']'' magazine reported in 1993 how the country physician ] of ], ], had used maggots to cure the bedsores of an 80-year-old male patient. Some of the sores were nearly an inch deep, and infection had set in. Conventional therapies, including ]s and ], had failed. Dugas told the magazine that he remembered his grandmother, who was ], had undergone successful maggot treatment in the 1930s. He followed suit, and the man's sore healed within a month. Instead of facing ], the patient instead went into the hospital for ]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://discovermagazine.com/1993/aug/thehealingpowero259|title=The Healing Power of Maggots|date=August 1, 1993|author=Carl Zimmer|publisher=''Discover'' magazine|accessdate=February 18, 2015}}</ref>


==Regulation== ==Regulation==

Revision as of 12:28, 2 March 2015

A wound cleaned by maggots

Maggot therapy is also known as maggot debridement therapy (MDT), larval therapy, larva therapy, larvae therapy, biodebridement or biosurgery. It is a type of biotherapy involving the introduction of live, disinfected maggots (fly larvae) into the non-healing skin and soft tissue wound(s) of a human or animal for the purpose of cleaning out the necrotic (dead) tissue within a wound (debridement) and disinfection.

There is evidence that maggot therapy may help with wound healing.

Medical uses

Maggot therapy improves healing in chronic ulcers.

In diabetic foot ulcers there is tentative evidence of benefit.

In 2004 The FDA cleared Medical Maggots for use as a medical device in the United States for the purpose of treatment of the following:

  • Non-healing necrotic skin and soft tissue wounds,
  • Pressure ulcers,
  • Venous stasis ulcers,
  • Neuropathic foot ulcers, and
  • Non-healing traumatic or post-surgical wounds

Application in wound dressings

Maggots are contained in a cage-like dressing over the wound for two days. The maggots may be allowed to move freely within that cage, with the wound floor acting as the bottom of the cage; or the maggots may be contained within a sealed pouch, placed on top of the wound. The dressing must be kept air permeable because maggots need oxygen to live. When maggots are satiated, they become substantially larger and seek to leave the site of a wound to find somewhere suitable to pupate. Multiple two-day courses of maggot therapy may be administered depending on the severity of the non-healing wound.

Maggots can never reproduce in the wound since they are still in the larval stage and too immature to reproduce. They can only reproduce when they become adult flies and mate.

Mechanisms of action

The maggots have 4 principal actions :

  • Debridement
  • Disinfection of the wound
  • Stimulation of healing
  • Biofilm inhibition and eradication

Maggot therapy is further compatible with other wound care therapies such as antibiotics, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), skin grafting and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. While maggot therapy cannot be used simultaneously with NPWT, it can be used before NPWT to debride a wound so that it can be later closed with NPWT. Similarly, while maggot therapy cannot be used simultaneously with skin grafting, it can be used before skin grafting to debride a wound so that it can be later closed with skin grafting.

Debridement

In maggot therapy, large numbers of small maggots consume necrotic tissue far more precisely than is possible in a normal surgical operation, and can debride a wound in a day or two. Wound surface is typically increased with the use of maggots due to the surface wound not revealing the actual underlying size of the wound. They derive nutrients through a process known as "extracorporeal digestion" by secreting a broad spectrum of proteolytic enzymes that liquefy necrotic tissue, and absorb the semi-liquid result within a few days. In an optimum wound environment maggots molt twice, increasing in length from 1–2 mm to 8–10 mm, and in girth, within a period of 48-72 hours by ingesting necrotic tissue, leaving a clean wound free of necrotic tissue when they are removed.

Disinfection

Any wound infection is always a serious medical complication. Infected living tissue cannot heal. If the wound is infected with an antibiotic-resistant bacterial strain, it becomes difficult or impossible to treat the underlying infection and for any healing to occur. Wound infection could further be limb- and life-threatening. Maggot secretions are also effective against some antibiotic-resistant bacteria and have been shown to possess potent antimicrobial activity in early experimental studies from the 1930s. As early as 1957, a specific antibiotic factor was found in maggot secretions and published in the journal Nature. Secretions believed to have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity include allantoin, urea, phenylacetic acid, phenylacetaldehyde, calcium carbonate, proteolytic enzymes, and many others. Bacteria not killed by these secretions are subsequently ingested and lysed within the maggots.

In vitro studies have shown that maggots inhibit and destroy a wide range of pathogenic bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), group A and B streptococci, and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic strains. Therefore maggot therapy might represent a cost-effective method for managing MRSA infection. Other bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E.coli or Proteus spec are not attacked by maggots and in case of Pseudomonas even the maggots are in danger. Consequently, using maggots alone might lead to a change of bacteria cultures on the wound.

Limitations

The wound must be of a type which can benefit from the application of maggot therapy. A moist, exudating wound with sufficient oxygen supply is a prerequisite. Not all wound-types are suitable: wounds which are dry, or open wounds of body cavities do not provide a good environment for maggots to feed. In some cases it may be possible to make a dry wound suitable for larval therapy by moistening it with saline soaks, applied for 48 hours.

Maggots have a short shelf life which prevents long term storage before use. Patients and doctors may find maggots distasteful, although studies have shown that this does not cause patients to refuse the offer of maggot therapy. Maggots can be enclosed in opaque polymer bags to hide them from sight. Dressings must be designed to prevent any maggots from escaping, while allowing air to get to the maggots. Dressings are also designed to minimize the uncomfortable tickling sensation that the maggots often cause.

Comparative studies

In 2008, a scientific study published in the British Medical Journal compared the merits of maggot therapy and standard hydrogels to treat 270 British patients with leg ulcers from around the UK. Patients were treated with either maggots or hydrogel and their progress followed for up to a year.

The study revealed no significant differences in the time taken for the ulcer to heal, or in the patient's quality of life. Maggots were shown to be no more effective than hydrogel treatment at reducing the amount of bacteria present or in clearing MRSA. Although maggots were significantly more efficient at debridement of the wound, treatment with maggots was associated with more pain by patients. A separate study which compared the relative cost-effectiveness of maggot therapy with hydrogels estimated there was little to choose between the two therapies.

In a 2011 study of people with non-healing wounds, maggot therapy was more effective in debriding than conventional surgical wound-cleaning during the first week, but there was no significant added benefit by day 15. Surprisingly, wounds debrided by maggots showed significantly increased wound surface compared to surgical debridement "Moreover, the second week of treatment could be deleterious because a significant increase in wound surface area at day 15 in the MDT group was observed".

Biology of flies and maggots used in maggot therapy

Lucilia sericata, Green Bottle Fly
Protophormia terraenovae, Northern blowfly

Maggots are fly larvae, or immature flies, just as caterpillars are butterfly or moth larvae. Not all species of flies are safe and effective as medicinal maggots. There are thousands of species of flies, each with its own habits and life cycle. Some fly larvae feed on plants or animals, or even blood. Others feed on rotting organic material.

Those flies whose larvae feed on dead animals will sometimes lay their eggs on the dead parts (necrotic or gangrenous tissue) of living animals. The infestation by maggots of live animals is called "myiasis." Some maggots will feed only on dead tissue, some only on live tissue, and some on live or dead tissue. The flies used most often for the purpose of maggot therapy are "blow flies" (Calliphoridae); and the species used most commonly is Lucilia sericata, the common green bottle fly. Another important species, Protophormia terraenovae, is also notable for its feeding secretions, which combat infection by Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

All maggots used for debridement are specialized and grown in a laboratory setting. This ensures that the larvae are sterilized in order to prevent secondary infections caused by microbes carried in by the maggots. Due to their short lifespan, usability is limited. This means that shipment must be direct and over night. They are also sensitive to temperature variations and must be transported with great care. Some of these challenges have limited the use of maggot therapy in certain regions of the world.

History

Tales and early history

Written records have documented that maggots have been used since antiquity as a wound treatment. There are reports of the use of maggots for wound healing by Maya Native Americans and Aboriginal tribes in Australia. There also have been reports of the use of maggot treatment in Renaissance times. Military physicians have observed that soldiers whose wounds had become colonized with maggots experienced significantly less morbidity and mortality than soldiers whose wounds had not become colonized. These physicians included Napoleon’s general surgeon, Baron Dominique Larrey. Larrey reported during France's Egyptian campaign in Syria, 1798–1801, that certain species of fly consumed only dead tissue and helped wounds to heal.

Regulation

In January 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted permission to produce and market maggots for use in humans or animals as a prescription-only medical device for the following indications: "For debriding non-healing necrotic skin and soft tissue wounds, including pressure ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, neuropathic foot ulcers, and non-healing traumatic or post-surgical wounds." In February 2004, the British National Health Service (NHS) permitted its doctors to prescribe maggot therapy. In the European Union, Canada and Japan, maggots are classified as medicinal drugs, needing a full market licence. In the U.S., maggots for medicinal use are classified as a device.

Veterinary use

The use of maggots to clean dead tissue from animal wounds is part of folk medicine in many parts of the world. It is particularly helpful with chronic osteomyelitis, chronic ulcers, and other pus-producing infections that are frequently caused by chafing due to work equipment. Maggot therapy for horses in the United States was re-introduced after a study published in 2003 by veterinarian Dr. Scott Morrison. This therapy is used in horses for conditions such as osteomyelitis secondary to laminitis, sub-solar abscesses leading to osteomyelitis, post-surgical treatment of street-nail procedure for puncture wounds infecting the navicular bursa, canker, non-healing ulcers on the frog, and post-surgical site cleaning for keratoma removal.

However, there have not been many case studies done with maggot debridement therapy on animals, therefore, it can be difficult to assess how successful it is (Jones & Wall, 2007).

References

  1. ^ Sun, X; Jiang, K; Chen, J; Wu, L; Lu, H; Wang, A; Wang, J (August 2014). "A systematic review of maggot debridement therapy for chronically infected wounds and ulcers". International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 25: 32–7. PMID 24841930.
  2. Tian, X; Liang, XM; Song, GM; Zhao, Y; Yang, XL (September 2013). "Maggot debridement therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis". Journal of wound care. 22 (9): 462–9. PMID 24005780.
  3. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpcd/classification.cfm?ID=5505
  4. Monarch Labs package insert for Medical MaggotsTM http://www.monarchlabs.com/maggotpi.pdf
  5. Chan, DC; Fong, DH; Leung, JY; Patil, NG; Leung, GK (October 2007). "Maggot debridement therapy in chronic wound care". Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. 13 (5): 382–6. PMID 17914145. {{cite journal}}: Missing pipe in: |journal= (help)
  6. ^ Sherman, RA (2014). "Mechanisms of maggot-induced wound healing: what do we know, and where do we go from here?". Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM. 2014: 592419. PMID 24744812.
  7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771513/
  8. Reames, Mark K.; Christensen, Chris; Luce, Edward A. (1988). "The Use of Maggots in Wound Debridement". Annals of Plastic Surgery. 21 (4): 388. doi:10.1097/00000637-198810000-00017. PMID 3232928.
  9. Pavillard, E. R.; Wright, E. A. (1957). "An Antibiotic from Maggots". Nature. 180 (4592): 916. Bibcode:1957Natur.180..916P. doi:10.1038/180916b0.
  10. Heuer, Heike; Heuer, Lutz (2011). "Blowfly Strike and Maggot Therapy: From Parasitology to Medical Treatment". In Mehlhorn, Heinz (ed.). Nature Helps. Parasitology Research Monographs. pp. 301–23. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19382-8_13. ISBN 978-3-642-19381-1.
  11. Andersen, A. S.; Joergensen, B.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Johansen, H.; Karlsmark, T.; Givskov, M.; Krogfelt, K. A. (2009). "Quorum-sensing-regulated virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are toxic to Lucilia sericata maggots". Microbiology. 156 (2): 400. doi:10.1099/mic.0.032730-0.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  12. "The Role of Maggots in Modern Wound Therapy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 29, 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
  13. Parnés, A.; Lagan, K. M. "Larval Therapy in Wound Management: A Review". Retrieved 2007-05-06.
  14. V. Scavée, Fr.-X. Polis, J.-Cl. Schoevaerdts. "Maggot Therapy : Many Hands Make Light Work" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 29, 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-06.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. Morgan, Rosemary (2002). "Larval therapy". Student BMJ. 10: 259–302. doi:10.1136/sbmj.0208271. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |doi_brokendate= ignored (|doi-broken-date= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ Dumville, J. C; Worthy, G.; Bland, J M.; Cullum, N.; Dowson, C.; Iglesias, C.; Mitchell, J. L; Nelson, E A.; Soares, M. O; Torgerson, D. J; Venus Ii, Team (2009). "Larval therapy for leg ulcers (VenUS II): Randomised controlled trial". BMJ. 338: b773. doi:10.1136/bmj.b773. PMC 2659858. PMID 19304577.
  17. "Maggot therapy hope 'premature'". BBC News. 2009-03-20. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
  18. ^ Blaizot, Xavier; Blaizot, X; Mourgeon, B; Chêne, Y; Creveuil, C; Combemale, P; Laplaud, A. L.; Sohyer-Lebreuilly, I; Dompmartin, A (2012). "Maggot Therapy for Wound Debridement". Archives of Dermatology. 148 (4): 432–8. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2011.1895. PMID 22184720. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |display-authors=9 (help)
  19. Sherman, R. A.; Hall, M. J. R.; Thomas, S. (2000). "Medicinal Maggots: An Ancient Remedy for Some Contemporary Afflictions". Annual Review of Entomology. 45: 55–81. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55. PMID 10761570.
  20. Whitaker IS, Twine C, Whitaker MJ, Welck M, Brown CS, Shandall A (2007). "Larval therapy from antiquity to the present day: mechanisms of action, clinical applications and future potential". Postgraduate Medical Journal. 83 (980): 409–13. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.055905. PMC 2600045. PMID 17551073.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S (2000). "Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions". Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45: 55–81. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55. PMID 10761570.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. FDA CDRH 510(k) summary LINK
  23. The Pink Sheets Panel To Recommend Classifications For Five Preamendments Medical Devices Aug. 25–26 LINK
  24. http://www.amazon.com/Honey-Maggots-Other-Medical-Marvels/dp/0395924928
  25. Sherman, Ronald A.; Morrison, Scott; Ng, David (2007). "Maggot debridement therapy for serious horse wounds – A survey of practitioners". The Veterinary Journal. 174 (1): 86–91. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.05.012. PMID 16831562.

External links

Wound healing
Categories: