Misplaced Pages

Talk:Trpinja: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:58, 6 March 2015 editMirkoS18 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,150 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:16, 3 May 2015 edit undoZoupan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,156 edits →Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in lead sectionNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
==] in lead section== ==] in lead section==
I think it is legitimate to mention alternate official name and spelling of Trpinja in ] in this article lead section. I think it is comparable with conversation that was held on Vukovar talk page ] with difference that in case of Trpinja there is no any controversy with local government. Even local deals with language and script issue in articles 54, 55 and 56. Also, I think user ] should stop his long lasting edit war over this issue and rise his objections and arguments on this article talk page or WP:Croatia project page.--] (]) 15:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC) I think it is legitimate to mention alternate official name and spelling of Trpinja in ] in this article lead section. I think it is comparable with conversation that was held on Vukovar talk page ] with difference that in case of Trpinja there is no any controversy with local government. Even local deals with language and script issue in articles 54, 55 and 56. Also, I think user ] should stop his long lasting edit war over this issue and rise his objections and arguments on this article talk page or WP:Croatia project page.--] (]) 15:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
:89.75% Serb population points that Serbian should be in the introduction.--] 17:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:16, 3 May 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCroatia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in lead section

I think it is legitimate to mention alternate official name and spelling of Trpinja in Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in this article lead section. I think it is comparable with conversation that was held on Vukovar talk page Talk:Vukovar#Transplanted discussion from WP:Croatia talk page with difference that in case of Trpinja there is no any controversy with local government. Even local Statut Općine Trpinja deals with language and script issue in articles 54, 55 and 56. Also, I think user IvanOS should stop his long lasting edit war over this issue and rise his objections and arguments on this article talk page or WP:Croatia project page.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

89.75% Serb population points that Serbian should be in the introduction.--Zoupan 17:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Categories: