| Revision as of 18:04, 7 March 2015 editCyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,474 edits →PK gross: Note about additional non-constructive edits.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:10, 7 March 2015 edit undoCyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,474 edits →PK gross: Tweak for clarityNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Hi, your edits here don't seem particularly constructive to me because you are unilaterally deciding that specific published sources are insufficient to your standard of accuracy without first arguing the matter at ], or running your objections past the ]. Also, the film was not produced in the United States, and US currency is not the default currency we should be using in a '''global''' encyclopedia. Please do not restore these changes without first establishing a local consensus on the article's talk page. ] (]) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC) | Hi, your edits here don't seem particularly constructive to me because you are unilaterally deciding that specific published sources are insufficient to your standard of accuracy without first arguing the matter at ], or running your objections past the ]. Also, the film was not produced in the United States, and US currency is not the default currency we should be using in a '''global''' encyclopedia. Please do not restore these changes without first establishing a local consensus on the article's talk page. ] (]) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| With regard to (and the accompanying edit summary) I'll point out that again your edit is not constructive. The source in the article is International Business Times, not Koimoi. If you take issue with the accuracy of the International Business Times, your remedies are the same as indicated in my previous comment. ] (]) 18:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC) | With regard to (and the accompanying edit summary) I'll point out that again your edit is not constructive. The source in the article is International Business Times, not Koimoi. If you take issue with the accuracy of the International Business Times, your remedies are the same as indicated in my previous comment. However, it certainly does not make sense to use a document dated 18 February (the source you prefer) over a 27 February article from IBT. Presumably the more recent source represents the more current and accurate value. ] (]) 18:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 7 March 2015
List of most expensive Indian films
I have created this article; since you seem to specialise in finding and adding authentic fiscal information on Indian films, can you try expanding it with reliable sources? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you don't want to edit the article, a simple refusal is the best answer. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
PK gross
Hi, your edits here don't seem particularly constructive to me because you are unilaterally deciding that specific published sources are insufficient to your standard of accuracy without first arguing the matter at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, or running your objections past the Indian Cinema Task Force. Also, the film was not produced in the United States, and US currency is not the default currency we should be using in a global encyclopedia. Please do not restore these changes without first establishing a local consensus on the article's talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
With regard to this edit (and the accompanying edit summary) I'll point out that again your edit is not constructive. The source in the article is International Business Times, not Koimoi. If you take issue with the accuracy of the International Business Times, your remedies are the same as indicated in my previous comment. However, it certainly does not make sense to use a document dated 18 February (the source you prefer) over a 27 February article from IBT. Presumably the more recent source represents the more current and accurate value. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)