| Revision as of 10:38, 13 March 2015 editRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:40, 13 March 2015 edit undoRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ::I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric ] to a , considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--] (]) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | ::I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric ] to a , considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--] (]) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::When you are trying to claim that how none of your edits are bad and how much different you are from Bazaan, you forgets that you are digging your own grave. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | :::When you are trying to claim that how none of your edits are bad and how much different you are from Bazaan, you forgets that you are digging your own grave. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::: Stop being so rude you retard. "Forgets" what? I don't even understand your English. Bazaan's edits were not controversial either. That account purposefully got itself blocked for sock puppetry, the account user clearly said "block me for sock puppetry", something out of a fit of rage. A joke maybe, but a crazy one (maybe didn't know a ban was indefinite). The record is there for everyone to see. The account Bazaan created several good articles. Regarding myself, an IP is not unique to a person. I think ultimately this is a personal campaign by a few WP Bangladesh members and nuts like you to target a specific editor simply because he shies away from a particular WikiProject's community. Not sure if you even understand anything I just said, |
:::: Stop being so rude you retard. "Forgets" what? I don't even understand your English. Bazaan's edits were not controversial either. That account purposefully got itself blocked for sock puppetry, the account user clearly said "block me for sock puppetry", something out of a fit of rage. A joke maybe, but a crazy one (maybe didn't know a ban was indefinite). The record is there for everyone to see. The account Bazaan created several good articles. Regarding myself, an IP is not unique to a person. I think ultimately this is a personal campaign by a few WP Bangladesh members and nuts like you to target a specific editor simply because he shies away from a particular WikiProject's community. Not sure if you even understand anything I just said, considering how blind you are. If only there was a real police investigation. Nafsadh and you would have been sent to jail.--] (]) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 10:40, 13 March 2015
Bazaan
Bazaan (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan/Archive.
10 March 2015
– An SPI clerk has requested administrator assistance for action regarding the case below. The requested action is below.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rainmaker23 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 203.112.78.254 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Confession made while logged out on user page. Previously he confirmed that this IP is indeed his. While discussing at ANI, I was looking into the histories of several Bangladesh related articles and I found a stunning similarity between behavior of Uck22 (sock of Bazaan) and interestingly, Rainmaker23 emerged soon after Uck22 & Co. got blocked for sock-puppetry in June 2014. When Rainmaker23 became active in some articles related to WikiProject:Bangladesh he appeared to be much more experience than his login's age. – nafSadh did say 15:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- So you're saying you WP:OWN WP Bangladesh articles? No new users are allowed to edit them? Have I harmed any of these pages? I'm pretty sure I've done my bit improving them, and there's a scope to do a lot more. But of course that won't be possible when they're monitored by the likes of you.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- That "page blanking" is more than sufficient. Also he created Rainmaker23 about 6 days after the block of Uck22. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric article to a paragraph, considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- When you are trying to claim that how none of your edits are bad and how much different you are from Bazaan, you forgets that you are digging your own grave. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Stop being so rude you retard. "Forgets" what? I don't even understand your English. Bazaan's edits were not controversial either. That account purposefully got itself blocked for sock puppetry, the account user clearly said "block me for sock puppetry", something out of a fit of rage. A joke maybe, but a crazy one (maybe didn't know a ban was indefinite). The record is there for everyone to see. The account Bazaan created several good articles. Regarding myself, an IP is not unique to a person. I think ultimately this is a personal campaign by a few WP Bangladesh members and nuts like you to target a specific editor simply because he shies away from a particular WikiProject's community. Not sure if you even understand anything I just said, considering how blind you are. If only there was a real police investigation. Nafsadh and you would have been sent to jail.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- When you are trying to claim that how none of your edits are bad and how much different you are from Bazaan, you forgets that you are digging your own grave. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric article to a paragraph, considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: 
Looks like a duck to me (see: ). Admin needed. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Categories: