| Revision as of 05:15, 22 July 2006 editTitoxd (talk | contribs)43,130 edits since all FAs were renominated: {{v0.5|class=FA|category=Natsci}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 14 September 2006 edit undoGunnar Larsson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,475 edits Ambiguous sentenceNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{Mainpage date|June 15|2005}} | {{Mainpage date|June 15|2005}} | ||
| {{v0.5|class=FA|category=Natsci}} | {{v0.5|class=FA|category=Natsci}} | ||
| ==Ambiguous sentence== | |||
| From the article: | |||
| :''The image reveals two 'caps' of less ionised material at the edge of the nebula'' | |||
| Should it be read as that the material in these regions are less ionised compared to other regions; or that the concentration of ionised particles is lower, or something else? | |||
| If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. ] 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:03, 14 September 2006
Template:Featured article is only for Misplaced Pages:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date Template:V0.5
Ambiguous sentence
From the article:
- The image reveals two 'caps' of less ionised material at the edge of the nebula
Should it be read as that the material in these regions are less ionised compared to other regions; or that the concentration of ionised particles is lower, or something else?
If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. Gunnar Larsson 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)