Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:01, 22 July 2006

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Archives
February - June 6 2006

Phish and their musical costumes

Thank you for helping me with the Phish musical costume page. This is my first page i've created and i'm sorry if I've made a whole lot of mistakes or anything.

Thanks again!

K.F.A.

why just cuz u dont agree doesnot make it nonsense (Googleyii 02:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC))

First, please assume good faith on other editors. Second, the notice was placed first because it was believed to be nonsense, but also because it doesn't seem to fit WP:N and doesn't have the importance of the group from reliable sources. There are no hits on the search engine Google to verify this information. Once such sources are cited, we can move on from there. Cheers! --MOE.RON 02:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Travis S Taylor

I'm not entirely certain what to think about your message. I can't determine if you just think I should re-write the article (which I can do) or if you think it's not important enough to have its own page and should just be left to be deleted (which I can also do). So seeing as I'm confused, I'm just going to leave it put for the moment. -- Jaerune 04:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Follow-Up: I rewrote the article as best as I could. There's not a lot of information about Dr. Taylor, but as he's working with John Ringo on an upcoming book, I think he at least warrants a small page. -- Jaerune 05:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Satoshi Kamiya

Please don't re-tag pages as speedy deletions when an editor in good standing (in this case, an admin) has removed the speedy tag. We want the page author to use {{hangon}}, but others certainly can remove speedy tags. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 01:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Non-admins can also remove speedy tags (and in fact should do so when they disagree with speedy deletion). In cases that might be worth debating (i.e. if the tag remover isn't an obvious sockpuppet), it's better to take the issue to WP:AFD than to re-add the speedy tag. Anyway, no harm done with this one. Thank you for helping with new page patrol! Kusma (討論) 01:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem about the tag, Moeron. Happy editing. --Fang Aili 01:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Deadheads

Didn't know where to look on the Deadhead page for discussion. Now that you pointed out where that was, will go there to discuss. -- Michael Trigoboff

Copyvios

Re - please be aware that within 48 hrs of posting a copyvio article is liable to be deleted under WP:CSD A8 if certain conditions are met. User {{db-copyvio|url}}. Cheers. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Cosmophysics

The page cosmophysics is necessary for a comprehensive classification of physics. So please dont redirect it now. It will be edited later so that it will look different fron as it appears now. ] 20:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)]

Until you make the differences, you should not do so on an actual page. My suggestion it to either use the WP:Sandbox or to create you own, such as User:Austin Maxwell/Sandbox. This why, there will be no confusion why there are two articles with the same content. -- MOE.RON 20:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Phish album order

Sounds good! However, it does say "There are no explicit guidelines on how to incorporate an album article in a discography," so maybe a vote would be best. It just seems weird to have "Phish NYE 1995" listed as an album that cones after "Undermind." Cheers - User:Sectornine

live album dates in chronology

I put it in there because I still think it is ridiculously confusing that a live album from 1995 appears to be an album from 2005. You got your way with the order, even though the Misplaced Pages SPECIFICALLY states that "There are no explicit guidelines on how to incorporate an album article in a discography." Therefore, I still think we need to vote. Outside advice does not mean it has to be one way or the other. We are not AllMusic or Amazon. This is a community based website, and it should be up to the contributors, not just one editor. It would be nice if you could compromise a little bit and let the contributors decide as a whole instead of making every single decision regarding the Phish page, which I've noticed has happened by looking at the history. I will begin the vote on the main Phish discussion page so everyone can chime in. Thanks - User: Sectornine.

Alan Chartok rv

Thanks for the revert on this page. I'd suggest adding warning tags in these cases so people can track repeat vandalism. In case you haven't used them before, you just need to type {{subst:test1}} ~~~~ as an example. The full list is at WP:USETEMP and some policy here . Antonrojo 20:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I use them a lot, I just got caught in something as soon as I reverted. Thanks! -- MOE.RON 20:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Minor league players

I didn't realize that some of the minor league player biographies were reposts. The first few I checked didn't seem to be, so I assumed the rest were fine as well. If you're sure that minor league players don't belong in Misplaced Pages, then do whatever you think is necessary, but I thought that WP:BIO's line "Sportspeople/athletes who have played in a fully professional league" would include the minor league. If you want to keep the articles, then please add relevant categories such as Category:Minor league baseball players, Category:Cleveland Indians, Category:Living people --TruthbringerToronto 23:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

As well, Kyle Collins should probably be treated the same way as the other minor leaguers. Kyle Collins was not a recreation according to the deletion log.

Music article usage conventions

Moeron, just been looking at some of your Dead album article additions. Please note - songs go in quotes, "Truckin'"; albums go in italics, Europe '72; the album name in the first line (only!) of an article goes in bold italics, Skeletons in the Closet. No other names go in bold unless they are alternate names for the title of the article (and thus the subject of a redirect). Keep truckin' on ... Wasted Time R 01:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Devils & Dust Tour

Always nice to know these articles have readers. Like you said, it isn't finished yet. Wasted Time R 03:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Grateful Dead discography

BTW, what do you think of my comment at Talk:Grateful Dead discography? You've done a lot of good work on it, yet I still think that the contemporaneous live albums need to be listed intermixed with the studio albums, otherwise the historical sequence is completely lost. Wasted Time R 03:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Pf-20060630-phil.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pf-20060630-phil.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Punk'd

Hahahahaha, i love it! You had me fooled.--Gephart 18:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Editing tip

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Keep up the vandal fighting! --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 01:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Moeron! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael _{/ 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)} 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

NPOV

While my logitech comment might have sounded biased, I would like to somehow incorperate it into the article, as it is a true fact, it's not a personal opinion, for the most part. If you would like to reword it, be my guest, but I do intend to mention it somewhere in the article. Thanks. --Rake 00:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Faking the s/w interface

Please don't fake the interface Wikimedia uses in page content. It's confusing for new users, makes it so we can't trust the site, and isn't cool. I've taken the liberty of removing it from your user/talk pages. --Improv 17:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Alton towers

Well then please alter the paragraph, and then I will have no need to 'vandalise' pages, will I? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.37.130.141 (talk • contribs) .

Barn Stars and Warnings

Sorry mate, I didn't know there was a policy on barn stars. Forgive my warnings and thank you for pointing out the offical policy. I am somewhat new to Misplaced Pages and I might have became a little over zealious. Cheers!Jimjones5 20:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Warning given to me by Jimjones5

Jimjones5 (talk · contribs) gave me this warning because of this edit. I have removed the warning since I feel this is grossly unwaranted. Let me know if I am in the wrong here. Cheers! -- moe.RON 20:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, the user reverted their userpage here and implied "racism". -- moe.RON 20:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

You deleted your warning. You aren't allowed to do that. Please obey the rules of Misplaced Pages. Jimjones5 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Plus I never implied you were a racists.Jimjones5 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, removal of warnings "are generally prohibited", but not outright disallowed. I have stated why I have removed it both here, on my edit summary of my talk page and on your talk page. And you did imply racism by saying "maybe caused my racism." I don't even know anything about you beyond your user name (doing my part of the WP:CVU on the WP:RC page), and I have nothing against people named Jim, Jimmy, Jimminy, ect. -- moe.RON 20:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I do not wish to take sides in this dispute, other than to state that editing someone else's user page is not generally wrong. Stifle (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

(Copied to User talk:Stifle) We got this settled with this edit by JimJones. I appreciate your comments Stifle and have offered JimJones any help he may need in return. Cheers! -- moe.RON 21:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

User:65.78.112.37

Ya know we are getting annoyed with this. Seriously, why do ya'll just hate me adding my link and not the other people who added theirs.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.112.37 (talk • contribs)

I am doing WP:RCP and came across the link. If you want to remove links, see Misplaced Pages:External Links and follow those criteria. -- moe.RON 03:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

that doesn't answer why your pestering me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.112.37 (talk • contribs)

so your going to come by, screw with that page and leave?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.112.37 (talk • contribs)

see the diccusion page. if your feeling helpfull.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.112.37 (talk • contribs)

so can you un-sick the bot?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.112.37 (talk • contribs)

I don't know what you mean; I am not a bot. You should argue why specific links need to be re-added at Talk:Laser tag#External Link Discussion. Remember, commercial links are very much frowned upon at Misplaced Pages, and adding links to discussion forums (even large ones such as usenet listings) is also generally not a consideration. If you feel a certain manufacturer/company whose link was removed deserves to be linked, I suggest you consider creating an account and creating some pages (though, depending on your page creations, they may be deleted as not being notable). -- moe.RON 05:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)\

ya you have to answer for this.

i agree, you are very unhelpful to wikipedia mr. moeron. please stop messing with the pages of which you have no clue about the content.

i for one find the tips section in taggers.org very helpfull

you really sound as if you are diliberately trying to make everything seem so insignificant maybe to make yourself feel better? please stop editing the lasertag page thankyouverrymuch

you are notnice!!!

you sound like a real big jerk!!! you must have something against certain things because it sounds as if you are trying to diliberately turn things into shit!!! what an abuse of power!! someone should really report you or something but i wish you would try to make this site better instead of using your time to overtake something that should belong to everyone!! please stop wasting your time and everyone else's!! im really offeneded and disturbed by your insolence on this entire website!!!

just get off allready, grow up, and go away from this site please!!!