| Revision as of 03:55, 18 March 2015 editJesseRafe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users71,491 edits →Lead: seriously???? Grow up. You started violating WP:CIVIL, etc, and you can't stand being informed that you're unequivocally wrong about this so you start name-calling and whining. "You have no business telling me I'm wrong", etc. Ha. Grow up,kid.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:58, 18 March 2015 edit undoFreeknowledgecreator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users179,107 edits Undid revision 651879211 by JesseRafe (talk) rv vandalism; edit summary is probably actionableNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| :::Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. ] (]) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | :::Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. ] (]) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I could not care less about your personal attacks ("someone as clueless as you") and incivility on a personal level, but I will take this opportunity to remind you that ] and ] are important policies and that you can be blocked for violating them. ] (]) 03:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | ::::I could not care less about your personal attacks ("someone as clueless as you") and incivility on a personal level, but I will take this opportunity to remind you that ] and ] are important policies and that you can be blocked for violating them. ] (]) 03:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I could not care less about your personal attacks ("someone as clueless as you") and incivility on a personal level, but I will take this opportunity to remind you that ] and ] are important policies and that you can be blocked for violating them. ] (]) 03:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:58, 18 March 2015
 | Film: American Stub‑class  | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
I added Jewtopia (film) to Tom Arnold's Filmography section since it was never added before this morning 09:59 Tim Correll — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Correll (talk • contribs) 09:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I added Jewtopia (film) to Camryn Manheim's Filmography section at about 13:20 on Sunday, October 13, 2013 since it was never added before this afternoon. Tim Correll 13:23 Sunday, October 13, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Correll (talk • contribs) 13:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Lead
JesseRafe, what do you think you are doing by making edits like this? I have seen thousands of film articles in my editing career, and believe me, it is perfectly "standard" for the lead of a film article to give the date the film was released. It's a basic piece of factual information that you have no business removing. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not in the way you initially did it. End of story. Please review the MOS before insisting your objectively incorrect information and subjectively poor style is proper. Bye. JesseRafe (talk) 03:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- My dear sir, if you did not like the way I initially did it, the proper thing for you to have done would have been to include the same information in some other way, not to summarily remove it from the article. Unless you have good information to the contrary, Jewtopia was indeed released in 2012, and so the information I added was not "objectively incorrect." Making weird and baseless accusations does not help other editors take you seriously, and neither do bizarre edit summaries like this. As anyone can see from looking at this history of this page, you were the one who removed basic factual information, not me. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. JesseRafe (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- I could not care less about your personal attacks ("someone as clueless as you") and incivility on a personal level, but I will take this opportunity to remind you that WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL are important policies and that you can be blocked for violating them. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. JesseRafe (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)