| Revision as of 16:09, 22 July 2006 editImprov (talk | contribs)5,494 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:52, 22 July 2006 edit undoZoe (talk | contribs)35,376 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Delete''', or userfy. Doesn't say anything of interest, only plausible use is disruption. Also agree with Herostratus. ] ] 04:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', or userfy. Doesn't say anything of interest, only plausible use is disruption. Also agree with Herostratus. ] ] 04:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''': It's not an attack page. Maybe you should nominate ''all'' the essays you don't like for deletion. ] 11:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep''': It's not an attack page. Maybe you should nominate ''all'' the essays you don't like for deletion. ] 11:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Note that User only has '''''one''''' edit to article space and spends all of his time trolling Talk pages, and making attacks on me. ]|] 19:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. Some things belong in user-space. --] 16:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Some things belong in user-space. --] 16:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 22 July 2006
Misplaced Pages:Jimbo makes mistakes
Attack page. Has been speedied several times, has been recreated several times. Do the rules of WP:NPA not apply to Jimbo? User:Zoe| 23:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Can you please explain what about this page is an attack? Over at Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2006_July_21#Misplaced Pages:Jimbo_makes_mistakes, a few people have agreed that it's NOT an attack. Friday (talk) 23:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think the page speaks for itself. Some people can be wrong. And in this case, are. User:Zoe| 23:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Still no reasonable rationale given for deletion. I encourage people to write Misplaced Pages essays, if it's a good-faith effort to improve the project. Friday (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- How does this improve the project, when all it says is that people should ignore Jimbo? User:Zoe| 23:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- You're misrepresenting what it says. But, that's an issue for Misplaced Pages talk:Jimbo makes mistakes, no? Friday (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- To be honest I like this page; unless this is a duplicate of another page I'd say this could be one of the things I'd refer people who are stressed out from some of Jimbo's descisions to so they can relax :). RN 03:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and salt the earth, Misplaced Pages-cruft for lack of a better term. --Deathphoenix ʕ 03:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- No Likey. Not good enough to be a Misplaced Pages essay, is all. The first sentence is rather a bit too flip, amd the rest is just obvious. Of course Jimbo makes mistakes. Nobody has ever claimed that he is incapable of error, for crying out loud. There have, after all, been only two perfect people so far (Christ and General Washington), so you're pretty much just knocking down a straw man. However, it's OK by me if it's in moved into userspace and not listed as an essay. If essay space gets crufted up with hundreds of third-rate essays that makes essay space less useful. Sorry. Herostratus 04:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, or userfy. Doesn't say anything of interest, only plausible use is disruption. Also agree with Herostratus. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: It's not an attack page. Maybe you should nominate all the essays you don't like for deletion. Azmoc 11:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Note that User only has one edit to article space and spends all of his time trolling Talk pages, and making attacks on me. User:Zoe| 19:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Some things belong in user-space. --Improv 16:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)