Revision as of 11:53, 4 April 2015 editJoeSperrazza (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,945 edits →April 2015: see Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Habilemonkac_and_Foreign_volunteers_for_nursing_for_the_German_Red_Cross_during_World_War_II← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:06, 4 April 2015 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators767,313 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on User talk:Jimbo Wales. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 11:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC) | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 11:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font face="Papyrus" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 12:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:06, 4 April 2015
Habilemonkac, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Habilemonkac! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
Nomination of Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 4ing (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Germanic, DRK and Riksarkivet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Foreign volunteers for nursing for the German Red Cross during World War II
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Foreign volunteers for nursing for the German Red Cross during World War II, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iselilja (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
Pasting a copy of Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II to User talk:Jimbo Wales is a bad thing. Don't do that again. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Habilemonkac_and_Foreign_volunteers_for_nursing_for_the_German_Red_Cross_during_World_War_II. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at User talk:Jimbo Wales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz 12:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)