Misplaced Pages

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

American Dad! editing dispute

I have turned the discussion at Talk:American Dad!#Season 11 & season 12 dispute over to the Dispute Resolution NoticeBoard as User:Wattlebird doesn't seem to think consensus and opposition against him is satisfactory, resulting in his continued reversions and edit warring. Dispute Resolution Noticeboard rules indicate that I'm to inform all editors involved in the discussion of my submission in case they would like to provide input. If you you would like to provide your input regarding the edit under dispute, that be much appreciated. The Dispute Noticeboard Discussion is here Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:American Dad!#Season 11 & season 12 dispute. Cheers! AmericanDad86 (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

American Dad

It's easy to say that you're going to improve the articles, but in my experience, people often don't follow through with what they say. You can use a sandbox to edit them in the mean time, but I don't agree with leaving episode pages that contain next to no information just because some day somebody might improve them. However for now, I'll stop redirecting the pages if you stop recreating the pages already redirected. JDDJS (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 00:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 02:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Go to Talk:List_of_American_Dad!_episodes#Redirect_of_episodes

I already said multiple times that the discussion on whether or not to redirect the articles will take place at Talk:List_of_American_Dad!_episodes#Redirect_of_episodes. I chose this place instead of the episodes articles or my talk page because it should be consistent and public. If you don't participate in the discussion there, then don't complain when I redirect the articles. JDDJS (talk) 04:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Linking

Hi, please note that common terms are not linked] without a pretty good reason. Tony (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All About Steve (American Dad!), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Barker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

"Wow that was awful"

Could you explain why? 23W 22:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I may have been a little dramatic with that statement, i just didn't like what you did with the cast list. But overall very good improvements on the article, it looks good. Koala15 (talk) 04:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm planning on promoting it to GA after the season ends. The character list was bordering on being indiscriminate with all the secondary characters listed, so I condensed it to just the main characters (maybe I shouldn't have split it into columns). I'll try to clean it up, but what do you think? 23W 04:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

The Slim Shady LP

File:The_Slim_Shady_LP_CD_tracklisting.jpeg;

Here is a scan of my copy of Eminem's 1999 major label debut album "The Slim Shady LP" track listing; I have had it since I was a kid; got it for my 6th birthday (the year it was released) and have nigh on memorised every little detail of the album cover; artwork; booklet etc and it does not have on the back of it any of the featured artists names (IE Dr. Dre, Dina Rae, Royce da 5'9") on the back. Just thought I'd let you know Bling$Bling$Blang$Blang$ (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Koala15 (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tha Carter V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 23:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 23:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Paris Honeymoon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paris Honeymoon, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.primewiremovies.org/movie/247958/paris-honeymoon-1939.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Robin Thicke

Hey can you please upload a photo of Robin Thicke from the 2013 MTV VMA performance? I can't really do it because i have no idea about copyrights. Please if you upload it then let it be a free picture.. i mean i would like it to be available for every wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.39.202 (talk) 21:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure if their are any free ones available. Koala15 (talk) 01:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

JDDJS (talk) 02:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

The Little Mermaid (1989 film)

Hi, I just reverted your revert of my edit. The reason for my deletion is on the talk page, please discuss it there if you disagree. AD (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Side of Heaven

added a link pointing to Jane Jones

Thieves (1977 film)

added a link pointing to Ian Martin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

psst Koala

when accuse someone of advertising "their site" and you are clueless whether it is their site, is that what your team does at wiki? you didnt get this month's allowance from the industry? not enough funds coming through? There are a dozen instances dating from 2008 where wiki editors have posted excerpts from this publication in a dozen stubs where the subject matter fails the "notable" criteria and yet Wiki's editors have allowed the excerpt since it was convenient and helpful to the stub and the donation from the company that commissioned the sub. Well I did a little research before posting the comment from the mag and noted it was already featured in wikipedia on several pieces. Your argument is typical of the problem mentioned in the press, if the excerpt is convenient for wiki the notable critieria is overlooked, if the comment is inconvenient the notable criteria is used as a crutch to remove something that could have relevance but is either inappropriate or not suited to the decorative taste of the page editor. As I asked before are you PMSing right now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.86.88 (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't know if it is your site but usually when people post reviews from amateur sites, it means they are advertising their own. And just because you saw it on a few articles, that does not make it notable. Koala15 (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Sin City: A Dame to Kill For shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You should know better than to engage an IP editor troll in a war. Oosh (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Of course i realized i could be in violation of this rule, but i felt i shouldn't leave this advertising content on the page. I tried everything with this editor but he just kept edit warring. I don't think i should receive a warning like this for keeping the page clean. Koala15 (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Take a long-term view of these things, the world won't end if some rubbish sits there for a little while until an Admin can resource, it's always best to remain calm and don't feed the trolls. -Oosh (talk) 05:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Needless reversions

Hi Koala, I've noticed you've twice changed gross totals at Planes: Fire & Rescue per your personal preference, for example here, where I can't find a constructive counterargument in your summary, "keep it as a full number" or here where you don't add an edit summary at all. As I previously tried to explain in this edit, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason to revert, nor is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, should you attempt to make that argument. Contrarily, MOS:LARGENUM says: "Precise values (often given in sources for formal or matter-of-record reasons) should appear in articles only where stable and appropriate to the context, or significant in themselves for some special reason." The precise values you are submitting for a movie still out are not stable, and there is no real context that makes them appropriate for inclusion, and they are not significant in themselves for some special reason. See also this discussion where a consensus is established on the use of these long digits in film (which I admittedly learned about recently.) I also added an embedded note at Planes to explain that the Gross infobox parameter now indicates rounded numbers, but it appears you deliberately ignored that note in this edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

This whole not using the full gross thing is just a preference of a small number of editors, the full gross has been used on here for years. I haven't seen enough concrete rules that we can't use them. As for that date template, it is just pointless. Koala15 (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that you don't get to decide that the existing consensus at WT:FILM is too "small" for it to be a consensus, and (predictably) you are arguing WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Consensus has been established, consensus can change over the years, and the guidelines for expanded numbers are in the MOS, which is a Misplaced Pages-wide consensus. If you have a problem with these existing guidelines, then you need to argue for local consensus on all the articles you edit. Until then, you are editing against consensus established by the relevant WikiProject. Nothing in your response so far constitutes a coherent counterargument for any of these points. You have every right to participate in the various WikiProject discussions that come up, and if you don't, don't complain. But attempting to take ownership of content as you appear to be doing in this case isn't constructive, and isn't consistent with community editing. (Addendum:) Per the instructions at Template:As of: "The template {{as of}} is used to mark potentially dated statements, and will add an article to the appropriate hidden sub-category of Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements. This allows editors to catalogue statements that may become dated over time." Since we are using ephemeral dates that may get updated until such a time as they are no longer updated, the template will alert other editors of this fact, so they can update the content appropriately. That you say it is pointless (without any explanation) doesn't mean that it is pointless. It's just another thing you don't like, but can't explain why. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

The fact that you think i'm trying to take "ownership" of the content lessens your argument. I just don't think that their has been a definitive enough guideline set against the full gross. Since the majority of film articles still use it. Koala15 (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I think I've said already that the definitive guideline is MOS:LARGENUM, and Template:Infobox film now reflects the specific consensus established through discussion at WT:FILM. So far you've only asserted that your perspective is correct because the other "majority" of articles haven't been changed yet. The new consensus was established in May. And I'm sorry, where did you find that the "majority" of articles list the long-form gross totals? Or is that just hyperbole? If you're going to dig in your heels on this, I think I have the stronger argument since I'm citing both general MOS numerical guidelines as well as a discussion that you could have been a part of. Your argument is that you don't like it, and that all the other articles haven't been changed yet. Unless you have something more substantial than WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I think you're out of gas. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Since we obviously disagree, I'm opening the discussion to comments. You are encouraged to adequately state your position. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Koala, consensus is established through discussion and I notice that you haven't participated in this discussion yet. It's up to you whether you will or won't, but if you choose to abstain, then I think it's reasonable of me to expect that you won't be reverting future edits that reduce long form box office gross values ($123,456,789) to condensed, rounded values ($123.5 million). I can tell that you care about movie and TV articles, and although I personally find your lack of constructive edit summaries frustrating, and your recent reversions of my edits seem arbitrary, and emotionally inspired to me, I believe that you are a good editor. You really should be participating in the various WikiProject discussions so that you can help shape the guidelines that we all use to write articles. No pressure. Just a thought. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Updating Bio Pages

Hello.

When altering an article to reflect the cause of death for an individual or celebrity, please ensure that the language immediately above your edit reflects the passing (i.e, "was," rather than "is"). This is in reference to your alteration of the Jimi Jamison page. It's a somewhat common error, but it really shouldn't happen — especially not when the article is no more than 6 paragraphs in length.

Please be more careful, so that we can keep Misplaced Pages relevant.

Thank you.

Jonpaulusa (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh yeah, it was a brief accident, someone else had it fixed right away. Koala15 (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Renegades of the West) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Renegades of the West, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor Upjav just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your page creation! Keep it up!

To reply, leave a comment on Upjav's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Scarlet River) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Scarlet River, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor SantiLak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article, don't forget to add a plot if you can

To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Yeah, i haven't seen it so i can't add a plot, but hopefully someone will. Koala15 (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Vote on to KEEP or CHANGE American Dad's episode guide.

Hey there, us over at the American Dad! talk page are considering are deciding if we should KEEP the longer-season number (in which Season 11 would be the "three episodes" and TBS's season would be Season 12) or CHANGING to the fewer-season method (in which Season 10 is the three episodes and Season 11 is the TBS season). On September 12, 2014, we will be changing or keeping the episode guide and are asking you to vote on to KEEP or CHANGE the episode guide. Thanks. Spongey253 (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Question About Talib Kweli & NIKO IS

Hey There,

I saw you undid my edit adding NIKO IS as a related artist. Not sure why this happened as he is signed to Talib's label (http://www.javottimedia.com/artists/niko-is/), and he is tweeting about NIKO regularly?

https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509371432594575360 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509319598827528192 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509161357355536384 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509034254215684096 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509024951794663424 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509001538921324545 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/508858989300711424

Thanks M8, Nik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikwilliamson (talk • contribs) 20:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Him being signed to his label does not make him an associated act. They would have to have collaborated a number of times to be considered that. Koala15 (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

American films

Hi, can you add new entries to the lists like this? I'm trying to make the lists as comprehensive as possible though so I'd much appreciate you adding missing films into the lists so readers can browse and access as full a lists as possible by year!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Yeah sure, i could give it a shot. Koala15 (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Series overview and potential copyright violation

With regard to your reversion here, the guidelines for the Series Overview table have been changed recently. See (MOS:TV#Series overview) The argument "no page has it this small" is not sufficient justification to restore it as it constitutes a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. Additionally, the synopses you submitted look an awful lot like content found for example. We cannot copy/paste or even closely paraphrase these synopses--you can get blocked for this. Synopses must be written from scratch, preferably by someone who has seen the episode. (They should also be between 100-200 words and do more to describe the episode than provide a logline.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

So your trying get me blocked for this? Rewrite the summary's then, i still don't get how a sentence can be copyrighted. I tried to rewrite as much as i can without it going into WP:OR territory, cause i haven't seen these episodes. Koala15 (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I have no interest in you being blocked because I think you are generally a good editor and your contributions are useful. I do, however, have an interest in you not submitting copyrighted content, adamantly claiming that the content is original, and sparking a mini-edit war of the matter. Since my attempts to explain matters to you were unfruitful, it seems that rather than warring with you, admins should weigh in. Your other POV edits are problematic as well, since you seem to be demonstrating more often (see Needless reversions section above) that consensus is not something you care to adhere to. This is a community editing project, not the Koala15 show. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

You don't have to act snippy about it, we could have solved this on our own. I just wanna know where we cross the line between paraphrasing summary's and original research. Koala15 (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

There was nothing to suggest that we could have solved it on our own, since you keep making reverts in spite of clear references to existing guidelines, and ignoring what I felt were rational arguments, both recently and in the past. Since I am neither interested in edit warring, nor feuding, ANI seemed the quickest way to resolve the matter. As for the snippiness, please note also that I've attempted to balance my snippiness with compliments in my note above, and in some of my other notes on your page. You are allowed to watch a TV episode and write a summary of what you see. "SpongeBob does this, which results in XYZ, so the guys have to do ABC to get everything back to normal." That's not OR, as long as it doesn't contain personal interpretation, suppositions, or attempts to derive meaning, like "SpongeBob rescues Sandy Cheeks, which means he has a crush on her." For whatever reason, some contributors think that we are limited to one-sentence loglines. That is not the case. Summaries should be 100-200 words. It is probably easier to write a 100 word summary than to write a logline that isn't going to look like plagiarism. As for the Series Overview boxes, you can still participate in the shaping of that guideline if you object to the width limit. There is a lengthy discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Television. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I get your point, but it is hard for me to paraphrase a summary for an episode i haven't seen. I also find it hard to substitute the words. And about the series overview template, i just think it looks stupid so small, and with all that white space. I don't know what the people at MOS are thinking. Koala15 (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

If you haven't seen the episode, and are trying to write summaries based on the loglines, you will have an impossible time. We can't just tweak one or two words and move a clause around and call it original content. I would strongly recommend not writing anything, and waiting until you either see the episode, or until someone else submits a thorough summary. Misplaced Pages has no deadline. Re Series overview: Though a 100% wide table looks fine on a mobile phone and probably on a tablet, I have a 27 inch (68.5cm) monitor. A 100% table with four columns on it, takes up 19 inches (48.2cm) of horizontal space on my screen. That's more than two pages wide for four bits of data. Not efficient. And many people have screens even larger than that. Whitespace is not our enemy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Withdrawn. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Season 18

The Tattletale Frog/D.W. and Bud's Higher Purpose is going to be the first episode of Season 18. --24.170.75.206 (talk) 15:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Birdman

Birdman poster Someone changed the Birdman poster to another image. As the film is not yet in theatres I'm not convinced the image that replaced the one you added is actually the "Theatrical release poster" (and replacement JPEG was too heavily compressed and looks terrible). I reverted the edits but the new image is still there. I'm hoping you might know how to properly revert the actual image and not just the text on the page as I have done. (Maybe I should download your version of the image and reupload it?) -- 109.78.172.77 (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

It looks like that is the theatrical poster, since it has the full billing block with the rating. Koala15 (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

T.I. article move

So I see you nominated Paperwork to be moved so that "the motion picture" can be dropped from the title. How long does it usually take for a move nomination to be done with? BlaccCrab (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

It could take a day or a few hours, in this case almost 3 days. I will try to ask an admin. Koala15 (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Yelawolf

We hit the revert vandalism button at the same time. Weird stuff. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Dangerous Venture) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dangerous Venture, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor Titodutta just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for starting the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Titodutta's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Copyrights

Hi Koala15, you've been asked numerous times (since at least since May 2014) to stop submitting copyrighted content, yet you still periodically submit copy/pasted loglines for example the episode synopses you submitted here can be found here and here. On your talk page you've twice said things like, "Well I don't know how words can be copyrighted" or "i still don't get how a sentence can be copyrighted". I hope you quickly do research to resolve this confusion. Books contain words. Words can be copyrighted. Television shows and songs and films contain words, and those words are copyrighted. Anything you write is automatically protected by copyright in the United States, and that includes episode loglines. This isn't a Cyphoidbomb vs. Koala15 issue, this is a basic academic issue: we do not copy/paste content from one site to this one without appropriate attribution, and even if we properly attribute, we cannot base large portions of a page's content (i.e. all the summaries) on content lifted from somewhere else. Episode synopses must be written from scratch, preferably by someone who has watched the episode, and who isn't trying to paraphrase a one-sentence logline. Misplaced Pages takes this seriously. Editors get indeffed for copy/pasting words,. In the real world, people get kicked out of school for copy/pasting words. People lose their jobs for copy/pasting words. It is not trivial. Your contributions are valuable to the project, and it would be a real shame if you wound up indeffed for something so avoidable. I beg you to please stop with the copy/pasting. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

What are you referring to? Koala15 (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Are you kidding? I posted links in my introductory sentence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

My bad, that was an error. It won't happen again. Koala15 (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Koala. I have faith in you, whether you believe that or not. You are a good editor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (The Marshal's Daughter) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Marshal's Daughter, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor Aytea just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Simple and well done. It will be of much greater value with an expansion of the plot section.

To reply, leave a comment on Aytea's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Alice

Dear Koala, It seems clear you work for the Disney corporation. Your entry is factually incorrect. The original sequel to Alice in Wonderland is called 'Through the Looking-Glass and what Alice found there'. Please can you correct this in your link. Alice Through The Looking Glass is not the name of the original sequel. Therefore please correct your link or I can send you the link to the Alice Through the Looking Glass website if this is what you feel people will be confused with. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be factually correct and impartial. I look forward to you updating accordingly. Jo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booneystar (talk • contribs) 19:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, i couldn't understand your edit, but i think i fixed it. Koala15 (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Bob's Burgers

And the reason you keep undoing the Bob's Burgers Burger of the Day isss....? (And this better be good.) --RThompson82 (talk) 02:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi RThompson82, although I really wish Koala would have used clear edit summaries, your attempts to wedge this content into Ambergris (Bob's Burgers), for example, doesn't seem to me like noteworthy content. Your edit summary, "Nope. If the Simpsons' chalkboard/couch crap is going to be in their articles, Burger of the Day will be in these. Period." attempts to assert some questionable authority over the article, which you do not have. And, your argument is basically a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. The Simpsons is a significant cultural landmark, and while Bob's Burgers is a fantastic show, it hasn't yet achieved the same status that would warrant mention of every minor gag, such as the oft-subtle Burger of the Day gags. And if you think the content is crap, why would you argue for the inclusion of more crap in an international encyclopedia? Rhetorical question. It's a pointless argument. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Cyphoidbomb, I couldn't have said it better myself. Koala15 (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Its less than 2KB or text. Why is this a big fucking problem? And if my additions have to go, why then do a number of earlier episodes get to keep their Burger of the Day listings? Its not crap -- I was being sarcastic. Also, Koala, I'm looking at this page and you don't have room to talk. --RThompson82 (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

RThompson82, nobody said it's a "big fucking problem". The size of the problem, however is not relevant. Content that isn't noteworthy, should not be included. When kids add crufty nonsense about which cartoon character is crushing on another cartoon character, we don't remove it because it's a "big fucking problem", we remove it because it's trivial. Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. And I only provided one example, because only one example was needed. The other trivia probably should be removed as well, unless they are notable on their own. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Tonight's episode ("Father of the Bob") revolved around the burgers of the day. Are we still pretending this isn't relevant? Really? --RThompson82 (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Cyphoidbomb Well since this Koala ass won't respond maybe you will. Did you see that episode? ^ --RThompson82 (talk) 05:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Tha Carter V

Please do not delete accurate information from the page Tha Carter V. Simply typing "hoax" isn't sufficient reasoning to delete content. Not only is your claim that it's a hoax incorrect, the track list was confirmed by Lil Wayne himself (But I'm sure you know more about his album than he does). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkatastic (talk • contribs) 16:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Where is your source then? Koala15 (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Hello Koala15:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Jesus Piece (jewelry)

You are invited to discuss page move proposal. --George Ho (talk) 05:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Why the revert to my edit of Mr. Peabody & Sherman?

Gidday Koala15!

I wonder why the revert to my edit of Mr. Peabody & Sherman? If no valid reason is given, I have no choice but to imitate a raw prawn and revert your revert of my edit such as in User_talk:Koala15#The_Little_Mermaid_.281989_film.29. DadaNeem (talk) 02:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You linked "financial failure" with "box office bomb". This film was not a "box office bomb". Koala15 (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for your contribution on VII – Teyana Taylor album. Karlhard (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Simpsorama

Can you write a plot for Simpsorama? Thanks in advance! Djole 555 (talk)

Get a Job (2014 film)

I suggest you ask politely, and then I will be more than happy to restore the article. The PROD was not challenged, so the article was deleted properly. GiantSnowman 13:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Well i wasn't trying to be mean, sorry if you took it that way. Koala15 (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Free Birds

Free Birds was Distributed by Entertainment One in the UK. To prove it, It shown it in the UK Trailer posted by Entertainment One.

"Party Central" short film

Hi. I noticed the edit you made to the Party Central note on the Monsters University article. I realize that the short was shown with Muppets Most Wanted in March 2014, but the short first premiered on August 9, 2013 at the D23 Expo. (I was there and saw it, and the first source supports that date.) That's why I wrote Fall 2013. Is it more appropriate to note the premiere date in the MU article, or when it was first shown to the general public? If the latter, then I think it should be noted that it was shown "March 2014 with Muppets Most Wanted." I'd like to know your thoughts. Thanks. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 08:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh i didn't realize it premiered in August 2013, so i guess its's fair to write that. Koala15 (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

--Thanks for the response. It turns out that Carniolus already fixed it. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, thanks for going through all the Children's BAFTA additions I made and fixing the citations! Luthien22 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Bridal Suite) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bridal Suite, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor Johnsmith2116 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nicely done.

To reply, leave a comment on Johnsmith2116's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Paramount Animation

In your latest edits in this page, you decreed the following...

Its fake, where's your source that its real?

Here is the source, direct from the company itself.

Art show flyer from CTN Animation Expo 2014

Be more considerate to your fellow Wikipedians and ask before you go declaring something is fake without proper research. We don't need any skeptics here. Thank you. Kresblain (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

A flyer for an art show is not really convincing, but i guess we shall see if its real when the studios first film comes out. Koala15 (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Kresblain, firstly, "skeptic" is not a slur, and Misplaced Pages absolutely needs more skeptics. What it needs fewer of, are editors who add previously unseen content without any edit summaries, who revert without any explanations, and who post condescending edit summaries on other users' talk pages when they, in fact, were not editing with a community in mind. The onus is on you to adequately explain and source your edits, not on other users to perform "proper research" to disprove you. Secondly, the content you are adding isn't reliably sourced. A random Dropbox link does not suggest a reliable source, nor does it suggest the logo is an officially sanctioned logo. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I really can't protest, Cyphoidbomb. You're absolutely right. We all try hard to make sure things are accurate and sound. Skepticism wasn't meant as a slur, and I apologize if it came out that way. The edit summary in question was added to the file directly, which had replaced a previous upload that was a clear placeholder logo. No mention was made in the accompanying article as a result of that update. As for the reliable source, the print material linked here is all that we have at the moment. The only thing I would suggest at this stage is to contact the company personally and have them verify whether or not it is an official logo mark. Good luck. Kresblain (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Terminator Genisys

Why did you upload a separate file of Terminator Genisys, when you could have clicked "Upload a new version of this file"? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, i guess i could have done that. Error on my part. Koala15 (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Jurassic World

I saw your removal of the criticism section. Saying "Nice try Dinosaur fanboys" in your edit summary isn't a valid reason for removal - and the content appears to be adequately sourced to multiple reliable sources - and while the criticism has been brought up on the article talk page, there appears to not be any argument there for its removal. But, before restoring, I wanted to see if there's more history or reasoning for the removal of which I'm not aware. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Adding a criticism section before the film's even out, really? There is always that one editor that takes things to literally and wants to add a "criticism" section or a "historical accuracy" section because they refuse to decipher fact from fiction. Two sources aren't sufficient either, The Guardian will posts criticism from me. Koala15 (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

As discussion of the criticism is already on the talk page, arguments against the section should be added there as well. I can actually see both sides on this one, and view it as a content dispute - which means talk page consensus - which Talk:Jurassic World#Criticism of the film seems to be no consensus at the moment, but leaning towards omitting at least for now. I encourage you to join that discussion, even if with just a brief comment.

And, in all fairness to the "Dinosaur fanboys", the criticism has been covered by dozens of news outlets at this point (the Guardian is kinda' late in their coverage, and appear to be copying some of their text from multiple other news sources). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Blacc Hollywood

Hi Koala, I was trying to add David Versis as a credited producer on the Blacc Hollywood page. I have this source to confirm: http://www.allmusic.com/album/blacc-hollywood-mw0002673160/credits

I work directly with David and was a part of the deal for this album. The record he did production for was titled 'The Sleaze'

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

If his name was listed in the booklet he would already be there. Koala15 (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey koala, I just checked the booklet and his name is there multiple times as David DaRosa (legal name) I'm also waiting for approval of his own Misplaced Pages page. Sorry the page link was wrong, the album is Wiz Khalifa - Blacc Hollywood

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

He would need a producer credit not a writers credit to be listed as a producer. Koala15 (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

In the booklet, under 'The Sleaze,' it has David DaRosa for a writing credit and immediately after says "Produced by Arthur McArthur for Canadian Jew Music, Inc. Additional Production by David Versis for Ring-leader Music Group, Ltd." That's why I listed him with as David Versis (co.)

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh OK, then you can add it in. Koala15 (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick replies Koala, this also brings to light that David DaRosa should be listed next to Tomaz and Jeremy McArthur under the writers because that is how it appears in the booklet. MerchantsofVenice (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MerchantsofVenice (talk • contribs) 21:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hey man I just wanted to know that How Can I edit a locked page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftbrainnation (talk • contribs) 08:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

If you are new, within a week you should be able to. Koala15 (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Southpaw

Hey Koala I'm curious as to why you took down my sourced cast addition ON southpaw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaviermaine (talk • contribs) 17:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Cause you used IMDB as a source. Koala15 (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I Won't Be Home for Christmas (The Simpsons)

Please, expand a plot of this episode... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.159.190 (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Paramount Pictures films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Go Lucky (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Stop your edit warring and get a ref for The Jungle Book (2015 film)

Have and Instragram post that says a director is on the set is in no way saying filming has commenced. ...so that no original research is needed to extract the content. One needs to infer or one is doing original research to obtain the meaning that filming has commenced. No film is 100% on a green screen... even Sin City, 300 and Avatar. Practice does also take place before filming. You have reverted two people multiple times. Travis Wong's ref is not a good ref either because he has been there since JUNE. Oh wait, you mean practicing on set!!!!!

Get a #(%$*&# ref that is able to be in the article that says filming has commenced!!! Bgwhite (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Two days ago The Philadelphia Inquirer said: "His The Jungle Book, starring Idris Elba, Scarlett Johansson, Sir Ben Kingsley, Christopher Walken and Lupita Nyong'o, is currently filming and is due for release next year." Is that enough for you? Koala15 (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes. Why in the world you didn't use this in the first place is baffling? You are also supposed to add it to the article to say filming has commenced and not in the edit summary after you have been challenged. So, please add the philly ref to the article now. Captain Assassain was blocked several times for doing exactly what you did (who you reverted), as has many others. Next time, add a reliable ref that actually says filming has commenced or you can be blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Well i didn't feel like it was necessary to add, since the source doesn't exactly say when it began filming. Koala15 (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Filming is actually underway Bgwhite, Koala is right about mentioning when filming began. --Captain Assassin! 16:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Terminator Genisys

What's wrong with adding this cast member? This nationally syndicated newspaper columnist considered her important enough to interview.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

What are you referring to? Koala15 (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. I should always do this.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Angry Birds (film)

Hello Koala15, I think we should move the Draft:Angry Birds (film) to the mainspace now. What do you say? --Captain Assassin! 16:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, i would say its in production by now. Koala15 (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay thank you. --Captain Assassin! 06:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

An article for deletion

Hey, can you suggest this article for deletion? This rapper isn't notable person to have an article on Misplaced Pages. Has released just one mixtape which had no commercial success. All the videos on his official Youtube channel shows how much unofficial can his videos and songs be. For example in this video the titles says that it's a collaboration with rapper 2 Chainz but in the video you can clearly see that 2 Chainz's parts are from his "I'm Different", "No Lie" and etc videos. Thanks in advance

Alright, will do. Koala15 (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

IPadPerson (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Arthur season 18 episodes are announced on KET, so why did you revert it?

Hi there! Why did you revert my edit on Arthur season 18 episodes? They were announced on KET.

My bad, i misunderstood your edit. Koala15 (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Save the Children (film)

added links pointing to Nancy Wilson and Cuba Gooding

Elf: Buddy's Musical Christmas

added a link pointing to Musical

The Jungle Book (2015 film)

added a link pointing to Akela

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Help regarding User:Zhaofeng Li/Reflinks

Hi Koala, I need your help in using User:Zhaofeng Li/Reflinks tool for fillling Misplaced Pages:Bare URLs. But i am not able to understand how to use this tool. Please guide me.( !dea4u  07:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC))

Just click through, and put the article name of your choice in the page name box. Koala15 (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (The Wild Olive) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Wild Olive, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor SparrowHK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work, but please remember to add content to the Plot section. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on SparrowHK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ty Dolla $ign

Hey Koala15. Can you cut this picture with Ty Dolla $ign and upload it as a new file? I would like to have that picture of him on Misplaced Pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.76.28 (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Plz do it

I am not very good at that, but i can try. Koala15 (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I will wait. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.41.31 (talk) 10:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Films

Hi, can you add films to the lists like List of American films of 1916 so people can find them? Cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok, after i create them. Koala15 (talk) 20:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Was going to mention As Men Love adding to the 1917 but realised I'd already asked you! Have a good one!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Koala15! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Koala15!

Koala15,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Reason for removing the religion of kanye west

I wonder why you removed the religion of kanye west, read the cite source it's in the title.

Reason for removing the religion of kanye west

I wonder why you removed the religion of kanye west, read the cite source it's in the title.Jason foren daniel (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

http://rapzilla.com/rz/features/story/6889-kanye-west-says-im-a-christian I'm reverting the editJason foren daniel (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Pyramid (film) dispute

let's see if we can resolve this ourselves. tell me where we disagree...

the film was originally called site 146. you can verify this at imdb.

it's found footage, right?

it was "released on December 5, 2014, by 20th Century Fox to extremely negative reviews," wasn't it? it got a 6% on rotten tomatoes.

many critics felt it was one of the ten worst films of the year. follow the citations. is the phrase 'many critics' a problem? because we can change it to 'several critics'. that's fine.

if you follow the hollywood stock exchange link, you'll see that the film was originally trading above twenty million dollars. there should be a graph directly accessible via the link.

thanks. 172.249.59.137 (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

First off, the "alt" parameter is not for alternative titles. And i don't think adding "extremely" to a sentence adds anything. Also, i don't think the "many critics" thing makes sense. Why not just add which publications called it one of the worst films of the year? Koala15 (talk) 04:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

thanks for clarification re: the alt parameter. i'll remove it.

i'm fine with nixing the 'extremely'.

seems like a good compromise would to be change 'many critics' to 'several critics.' this way we retain readability and if people want to know exactly which critics they can follow the citations.

appreciate it. 172.249.59.137 (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Neon Icon. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Koala15 reported by User:Mlpearc (Result: ). Thank you. —Mlpearc (open channel) 04:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Silent film task force

Hello! Thank you for all the work you've done, in adding articles about silent films to Misplaced Pages. I invite you to consider joining the Silent films task force, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of silent films. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingsman The Secret Service poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kingsman The Secret Service poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

In-Universe Style

Hello, I'm Gamebuster19901. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Shrek because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Also please be sure that your edits are not in an in-universe style. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gamebuster19901 (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The Heart of Youth

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Heart of Youth, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://silenthollywood.com/theheartofyouth1919.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hey! I know I'm a year late, but I just wanted to say nice job @ Finding Nemo! Bananasoldier (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

An Adventure in Hearts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elmer Harris

It Pays to Advertise (1919 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elmer Harris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Regular Show

Please don't change the edit i did to the Regular Show episode "Sugar Rush". I watched the episode and the Doughnut shop Clerk said they were called "Apple Fritters". If you don't believe me then watch that episode yourself and you'll see that my edit was 100% accurate. Any and all edits i make to wikipedia are 100% true and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roverzero1983 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Here's your proof that my edit was correct. http://regularshow.wikia.com/Sugar_Rush#Plot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roverzero1983 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Right, i remember that episode. May bad. Koala15 (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Funk Flex Full Throttle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diddy

Strange Magic (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trouble

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Boondocks edit

Hey, just letting you know my Boondocks edit is correct. Check the article I just added as a reference. Also, I was at The Hitlist when we first brought on Aaron so I know the dates intimately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajarchibald (talk • contribs) 16:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Discussion invitation

Hi, there is a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Television#Amending the MOS centered around whether or not we want to deprecate the Broadcast section in articles, and if not, how we want that content to be presented. In the past it has been stuffed full of unsourced nation cruft, which we no longer support, but there's still some question as to what qualifies as an "English-speaking nation" and we need to work out the language details. If this is something that interests you, please participate! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok, ill check it out. Koala15 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

If you google, Hitist.com and boondocks you can see several references that mention the boondocks debuting on The Hitlist, mostly from student publications as Aaron was doing a college tour at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajarchibald (talk • contribs) 20:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Duff poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Duff poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

re your reversal of properly sourced info on Sony Pictures Animation

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Sony Pictures Animation. Misplaced Pages is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Misplaced Pages to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. --Wuerzele (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes its sourced, but the lawsuit is probably not notable enough to be mentioned in the article. If we mentioned every time a company was sued it would be ridiculous. Try to discuss it on the talk page sine it is a controversial edit. Koala15 (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

I asked you to discuss your removal on the talk page.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

editwarring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Wuerzele (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Silent film articles

Hi Koala15, thanks for your great work in creating articles on many a Paramount, Realart and Artcraft stars. In creating the articles can you link the cast & crew (as many as who have wiki articles)? In addition to the 'cookies-in-the-search' bar, it lets us know the article has been created and that the individual has been linked to it. An example is my linking the cast & crew to your recently created article The Top of New York(1922). Thanks much. Happy editing.Koplimek (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Reverting without explanations

Hi Koala, I don't understand why are you still reverting other users without so much as extending the courtesy of an explanation as you did here? SchroCat has 46,000 edits under his belt with a slew of contributions to GA articles that he doesn't deserve to be reverted without a quick note about whatever guideline you think he has failed to grasp. And even if he were a fresh-off-the-block n00b, you could at least extend a courtesy of dropping an note to enlighten the user. Even in matters of clear vandalism there is no real benefit to avoiding some sort of summary like Rvv. There are other editors working here, in case you weren't aware. I'm reverting your reversion, and if you intend to resubmit it, I hope you can provide a better explanation than "I didn't like it." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

I didn't think it made sense to paraphrase the Rotten Tomatoes consensus, since the quote is already short. But yes i should have left a summary. Koala15 (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 31st Annie Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Winnie the Pooh film article

What was the issue with my edit on the Winnie the Pooh article? (Stating that it was to date the most recent traditional animated film from Disney) Did it need a source? Is it because the short Get a Horse! includes traditional animation? Please clarify. Thanks.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't know it seemed kind of trivial to me. Something like that could change. Koala15 (talk) 03:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh, ok. I was kind of inspired by the fact that the Home on the Range article has the sentence: "it was the last traditionally animated Disney film until The Princess and the Frog was released in 2009." So I thought that it might be worth putting that "most recent traditional animated film" note on Pooh and I figured that if it ever did change, the note could be updated. But, no biggie. Thanks for the response. I do appreciate it.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 08:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robin Thicke Get Her Back.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Robin Thicke Get Her Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sea Horses

Hi, I'm Irondome. Koala15, thanks for creating Sea Horses!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. looks ok so far, plot section is a priority for inclusion at this point. Notable director

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Irondome (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Lists

If you create any more can you add them to List of American films of 1926? Cheers. It would be great if you could go back and add the ones already created to the lists. The lists are quite important I think for documenting the films by year!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Can you at least give me a list of articles you've created then? I'm not sure why it's so much of a tall order to simply paste the films you create from a given year at the top of the film lists and I'll format them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Why do you add plot sections empty with tags? In my experience they're unlikely to make people add them and in the meantime they look unsightly. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

You can read my created articles from the link at the bottom of my contributions. I was gonna add them, but i have been pre occupied with creating these articles. And i don't know i just usually add the plot tags, someone will eventually write something there. Koala15 (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

You're working through the Paramount film list right? Can you just dump the film titles after completing a year at the top of the film list year pages and let me know and I'll format them. It's just I am keen to ensure that the lists are as comprehensive as possible and that we're not missing lots from each year. I'd like to put in more time on those lists but they're hard work and I've got a lot of other things to think about!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok, its on my list of things to do. Koala15 (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Any Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Straight Outta Compton/O'Shea Jackson Jr.

Hi, I notice you did a lot of edits on the Straight Outta Compton movie article. I created an article for O'Shea Jackson Jr. that was promptly deleted by admin Snuggims saying he "failed" notability. Then I noticed O'Shea already had an article under his rap name but it hasn't been updated in awhile... So I proposed for merger, and hope it will save the page. if you could contribute to the discussion about the merger/keeping the page I would appreciate it! Thanks! Discussion here! Wikimandia (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikimandia, I am not an admin. Also, I mentioned on my talk page that I actually redirected the article. Redirecting is different from deleting. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Musk Who Fell To Earth

Hello Koala! Are you watched before last episode? I'm not! I can not find the plot for this episode anywhere. Can you write a plot if you have free time? Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.159.59 (talk) 19:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj Lookin Ass Nigga.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj Lookin Ass Nigga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heads Up (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McGowan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the article

Please stop reverting the article for Monkey Kingdom. So far the film has yet to gain any actual coverage in reliable sources and a search only brings up brief mentions that the film will release. Right now it fails WP:NFF since the production of the film went largely uncovered by anyone other than Disney. It's expected that the film company itself will give their films coverage, but those sources are considered to be WP:PRIMARY and just being associated with Disney will not give the film notability. I have no problem with the article being created once the movie releases and gains coverage, but it should not be re-created until that point in time. The film just isn't notable at this point in time. Will it be notable? Probably- it is Disney after all, but we cannot guarantee that it's going to gain the necessary coverage to pass WP:NFILM and right now saying that it would violates WP:CRYSTAL. I've asked for a third opinion on this via WP:3O and I'd like it if for the time being you could discuss this on the article's talk page rather than continue to revert the redirect. This is beginning to turn into an edit war and I'd prefer to avoid that if possible. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Give me a break, of course its notable. The fact that you think you can revert an article like this is ridiculous. It's obviously coming out in nearly a month, and already is notable. Koala15 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

• How does it pass notability guidelines? The issue isn't that the film won't release but that it has not yet recevied enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:NFILM or WP:NFF. (Although there is always the issue of film releases possibly getting pushed back, so saying that a release date exists isn't itself a reason to keep something. Even Disney has delayed films at the last minute, which is why notability can and should only be determined through coverage in reliable sources.) If I were to bring it to AfD right now it very likely would end up getting closed as a redirect due to the lack of coverage. If you can provide this coverage then I'm open to discussion but just unredirecting and saying that "eventual release equals notability" is not good enough. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
• Since it's clear that you are going to continue to revert this and you don't seem to be particularly open to discussing this on the article's talk page, I've escalated this to WP:AN3. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

February 2015

The result of the AN3 noticeboard is that you are warned foe edit-warring. WP:CONSENSUS states that encyclopedic content of the articles is determined by consensus. In Monkey Kingdom, you resorted to reverting and failed to discuss your changes at the talk page, as your opponent suggested. You even refused to discuss them here at your talk page, saying that the film is "of course notable". I am not involved, and I am not going to discuss the content, but I do not immediately see any proof of notability in the material you tried to restore, meaning it is at the very least debatable. Next revert may get your account blocked from editing. Please in the future follow WP:BLD and if someone reverts your edits go to the talk page and discuss rather then edit-war. Edit summaries and edit-warring are not an appropriate way of resolve content disputes, we have different avenues for that, see WP:Dispute resolution.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

I just noticed that Sophie Hunter has notable relatives and this should be reflected in her infobox. All sources are in the family family section of the page. If you may be so kind to copy-paste this to the page, I would be very grateful and it would be a big improvement to her page. Thank you in advance! 62.46.161.223 (talk) 06:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

|family =

• Michael Gow
• (maternal grandfather)
• J. E. B. Seely
• (maternal great-grandfather)
• Timothy Carlton
• (father-in-law)
• Wanda Ventham
• (mother-in-law)

This IP is a sock of Fairyspit. Be careful as they spam editors to do their editing for them. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lone Cowboy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Will James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Along Came Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gregory Stone

Coronado (1935 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brian Hooker

The Accusing Finger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chandler House

You Belong to Me (1934 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elizabeth Alexander

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kid Rock First Kiss.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kid Rock First Kiss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 5 Flights Up (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nobody's Baby (1937 film) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nobody's Baby (1937 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Prison Farm (film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wildcat (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tropic Zone (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tropic Zone (film) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tropic Zone (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shibbolethink 05:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

The New Classic

Please explain this. — HĐ (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Genres should always be as general as possible. And i don't think her album is "dance pop". Koala15 (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Terminator Genisys poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Terminator Genisys poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Koala15, thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages, especially your recent creation of Country Music Holiday. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam 20:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Vanquished, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Party Crashers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Fitzgerald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Earned It, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Home Plot

Hello, you were unclear with a bit of the plotline of the movie Home, so I fixed some edits. Just wanted you to know.

Pezminer12 (talk) 07:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Marvelous Missing Link: Lost

Hello Koala15. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Marvelous Missing Link: Lost, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article uses both terms interchangeably, or at least doesn't explain the differet titles, so it's not clear what the album is actually called, thus what the article should be called. So it can't be uncontroversial. I'd suggest updating the article with sources on the title, or at least an explanation why there's two names, before a move can be considered. . Thank you. GedUK  12:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Well iTunes lists it under that title. I think whoever created the article just made a mistake. Koala15 (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Straight Outta Compton (2015 film)

Hi, why did you undo this? --82.136.210.153 (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Is it worth noting if hes not being portrayed in the movie? Koala15 (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

In my opinion it should say "included" instead of "include", because all of them are past members and N.W.A is no longer active, and I also think it's strange to leave out one member when it's not clear that the listing is not exhaustive. It says " rap group N.W.A, whose members include(d)" and then the article lists everyone except one member. That doesn't make any sense. A reader would not understand it lists all members but one. If one past member is not included, the text should be something like "some of whose members were" or ", among others" or something similar. Or: ", all of whom, with the exception of ..., are being portrayed in the movie." Also, you write "if hes not being portrayed in the movie", but maybe he is. Is there a reliable third party source that says Arabian Prince is not in the film? The full credits at IMDb - I know it's not a reliable source - lists Brandon Lafourche as "Arabian prince (uncredited)" which seems to indicate he is being portrayed in the movie. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, well then i guess it is worth noting. Koala15 (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)