| Revision as of 18:57, 24 July 2006 editHughgr (talk | contribs)1,265 edits added to ernst← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:12, 21 August 2006 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,276 edits rmv Negative proof fallacy. Was in the wrong place anyway.Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| '''Spinal adjustment''' is a term used by ] to describe any of a number of specialized spinal manipulations which are claimed to improve the alignment and/or motion of spinal and extremity joints. The procedures make up the mainstay of chiropractic treatment, but may be supplemented with exercise, electrical modalities and nutritional recommendations. | '''Spinal adjustment''' is a term used by ] to describe any of a number of specialized spinal manipulations which are claimed to improve the alignment and/or motion of spinal and extremity joints. The procedures make up the mainstay of chiropractic treatment, but may be supplemented with exercise, electrical modalities and nutritional recommendations. | ||
| Many chiropractors believe that spinal adjustment is different from the spinal manipulation performed by physical therapists and osteopaths because the latter never try to improve vertebral alignment when performing manipulations. Despite the differing treatment goals, the actual procedures performed are very similar. Further, any distinction is questionable because of evidence refuting the claim that adjustments reliably restore misalignments (called ]s by chiropractors).(Keating) The benefits of any spinal manipulation are questionable: a recent systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation published in The Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine concluded "Collectively these data do not demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition. Given the possibility of adverse effects, this review does not suggest that spinal manipulation is a recommendable treatment. |
Many chiropractors believe that spinal adjustment is different from the spinal manipulation performed by physical therapists and osteopaths because the latter never try to improve vertebral alignment when performing manipulations. Despite the differing treatment goals, the actual procedures performed are very similar. Further, any distinction is questionable because of evidence refuting the claim that adjustments reliably restore misalignments (called ]s by chiropractors).(Keating) The benefits of any spinal manipulation are questionable: a recent systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation published in The Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine concluded "Collectively these data do not demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition. Given the possibility of adverse effects, this review does not suggest that spinal manipulation is a recommendable treatment." | ||
| The most common “adjustment” employed by chiropractors is a high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) thrust that usually causes an audible popping sound that is theorized to be from ] gas being released from the ] found in ] joints. When an adjustment is performed by a chiropractor, the force applied separates the joint surfaces of the fully encapsulated joint creating a relative vacuum within the joint space. In this low pressure environment, the naturally dissolved nitrogen found in all bodily fluids turns into a ] and a sound is heard. This gas bubble will remain within the joint for hours while it is slowly reabsorbed by the body. The effects of this treatment include: temporary relief of musculoskeletal pain, shortened time to recover from acute back sprains (Rand) Common side effects include: soreness from minor, treatment induced joint strains, dependency on treatment and neck hypermobility. Less frequent but more serious side effects include: stroke, herniation of intervertebral disks and rib fractures.(Senstad) Serious complications due to manipulation of the cervical spine remain rare, having been documented at 1 in 3 or 4 million manipulations or fewer. The current estimate is based on multiple international studies of millions of chiropractic cervical adjustments spanning from present day back to at least 1965. The "one in a million" estimate is echoed in an extensive review of spinal manipulation performed by the RAND corporation. Less conservative treatments such as neck surgery are also commonly used for conditions very similar to the conditions chiropractors treat using spinal adjustments. In comparison, cervical spine surgery has a 3-4% rate of complication and 4,000-10,000 deaths per million neck surgeries. | The most common “adjustment” employed by chiropractors is a high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) thrust that usually causes an audible popping sound that is theorized to be from ] gas being released from the ] found in ] joints. When an adjustment is performed by a chiropractor, the force applied separates the joint surfaces of the fully encapsulated joint creating a relative vacuum within the joint space. In this low pressure environment, the naturally dissolved nitrogen found in all bodily fluids turns into a ] and a sound is heard. This gas bubble will remain within the joint for hours while it is slowly reabsorbed by the body. The effects of this treatment include: temporary relief of musculoskeletal pain, shortened time to recover from acute back sprains (Rand) Common side effects include: soreness from minor, treatment induced joint strains, dependency on treatment and neck hypermobility. Less frequent but more serious side effects include: stroke, herniation of intervertebral disks and rib fractures.(Senstad) Serious complications due to manipulation of the cervical spine remain rare, having been documented at 1 in 3 or 4 million manipulations or fewer. The current estimate is based on multiple international studies of millions of chiropractic cervical adjustments spanning from present day back to at least 1965. The "one in a million" estimate is echoed in an extensive review of spinal manipulation performed by the RAND corporation. Less conservative treatments such as neck surgery are also commonly used for conditions very similar to the conditions chiropractors treat using spinal adjustments. In comparison, cervical spine surgery has a 3-4% rate of complication and 4,000-10,000 deaths per million neck surgeries. | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 21 August 2006
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Spinal adjustment" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Spinal adjustment is a term used by chiropractors to describe any of a number of specialized spinal manipulations which are claimed to improve the alignment and/or motion of spinal and extremity joints. The procedures make up the mainstay of chiropractic treatment, but may be supplemented with exercise, electrical modalities and nutritional recommendations.
Many chiropractors believe that spinal adjustment is different from the spinal manipulation performed by physical therapists and osteopaths because the latter never try to improve vertebral alignment when performing manipulations. Despite the differing treatment goals, the actual procedures performed are very similar. Further, any distinction is questionable because of evidence refuting the claim that adjustments reliably restore misalignments (called vertebral subluxations by chiropractors).(Keating) The benefits of any spinal manipulation are questionable: a recent systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation published in The Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine concluded "Collectively these data do not demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition. Given the possibility of adverse effects, this review does not suggest that spinal manipulation is a recommendable treatment."
The most common “adjustment” employed by chiropractors is a high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) thrust that usually causes an audible popping sound that is theorized to be from nitrogen gas being released from the synovial fluid found in diarthrodial joints. When an adjustment is performed by a chiropractor, the force applied separates the joint surfaces of the fully encapsulated joint creating a relative vacuum within the joint space. In this low pressure environment, the naturally dissolved nitrogen found in all bodily fluids turns into a gas and a sound is heard. This gas bubble will remain within the joint for hours while it is slowly reabsorbed by the body. The effects of this treatment include: temporary relief of musculoskeletal pain, shortened time to recover from acute back sprains (Rand) Common side effects include: soreness from minor, treatment induced joint strains, dependency on treatment and neck hypermobility. Less frequent but more serious side effects include: stroke, herniation of intervertebral disks and rib fractures.(Senstad) Serious complications due to manipulation of the cervical spine remain rare, having been documented at 1 in 3 or 4 million manipulations or fewer. The current estimate is based on multiple international studies of millions of chiropractic cervical adjustments spanning from present day back to at least 1965. The "one in a million" estimate is echoed in an extensive review of spinal manipulation performed by the RAND corporation. Less conservative treatments such as neck surgery are also commonly used for conditions very similar to the conditions chiropractors treat using spinal adjustments. In comparison, cervical spine surgery has a 3-4% rate of complication and 4,000-10,000 deaths per million neck surgeries.
Other types of adjustments may include thrusts from mechanical instruments, dropping tables and gentle sustained touches.(Cooperstein) Another problem is the use of elaborate analyses based on questionable rationales because of outdated, incomplete and/or overly simplified biomechanical systems which are relied on to determine the alignment of bones.(Harrison)
Examples of these adjustments include: H.I.O., Toggle, Toggle-Recoil, Palmer, Knee Chest Upper Cervical, Kale, Full Spine, Gonstead, Thompson, Drop Table, Diversified, Activator, Pierce, Pediatric adjusting, Geriatric Adjusting, Pregnancy Adjusting and Extremity Adjusting.
References
Cooperstein, Robert. Technique Systems in Chiropractic. Churchill Livingstone. May 2, 2004.
Harrison, DE. “Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part I. A review of the literature." J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Feb;21(2):101-13.
Keating, J et. al. “In the Quest for Cultural Authority.” Dynamic Chiropractic. December 16, 2004. Vol 22, Issue 26.
Powell, FC. "A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulation therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain". Neurosurgery. 1993 Jul;33(1):73-8; discussion 78-9.
Rand Group (ed.). “Research Highlights: Changing Views of Chiropractic …and a National Reappraisal of Nontraditional Health Care.” 2001.
Senstad, Ola et al. “Frequency and Characteristics of Side Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy." Spine. 22(4):435-440, February 15, 1997.