| Revision as of 20:01, 24 July 2006 editAnomicene (talk | contribs)190 edits reply to SlimVirgin← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:03, 24 July 2006 edit undoAnomicene (talk | contribs)190 editsm →WikistalkingNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Anomicene, I was serious when I asked you to stay away from articles edited by Ironduke, so I'm disappointed to see that you followed him to one he created. Your accounts risk being blocked indefinitely if this continues. Please avoid editing the same articles as him, in order to allow this issue to settle down. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 19:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | Anomicene, I was serious when I asked you to stay away from articles edited by Ironduke, so I'm disappointed to see that you followed him to one he created. Your accounts risk being blocked indefinitely if this continues. Please avoid editing the same articles as him, in order to allow this issue to settle down. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 19:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :SlimVirgin, as I have noted before, it is not my intention to "wikistalk" IronDuke, nor am I doing so. I observe that he is editing many pages (], ], ], ], ], and others). Moreoever, the one you are complaining about, ], is linked from ], the only real page in contention. Are you actually objecting to the edits I made on ]? I feel that they are NPOV and would stand up to any scrutiny required. The Misplaced Pages harassment policy says: ''"This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy."'' The examples given of wikistalking say things like: ''"facetious strawman arguments"'', ''"editing a large set of articles"'', ''"constantly nit-picking "'', and ''"discouraging his positive contributions"''. I do not think that '''any''' of these things can be said about my edits. However, I will also note that ''"Threatening another person is considered harassment"''. This would appear to be exactly what you are doing to me. If any of my edits are inappropriate, or if you believe that the pattern somehow meets the definition of wikistalking despite the points above, then ''bring the matter to Arbcom''. I would be happy to defend my edits to disinterested parties. However, since IronDuke is taking your side in your current ArbCom case, I do not think you can claim to be a disinterested party here. -- ] 20:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | :SlimVirgin, as I have noted before, it is not my intention to "wikistalk" IronDuke, nor am I doing so. I observe that he is editing many pages (], ], ], ], ], and others) that I have no involvement with. Moreoever, the one you are complaining about, ], is linked from ], the only real page in contention. Are you actually objecting to the edits I made on ]? I feel that they are NPOV and would stand up to any scrutiny required. The Misplaced Pages harassment policy says: ''"This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy."'' The examples given of wikistalking say things like: ''"facetious strawman arguments"'', ''"editing a large set of articles"'', ''"constantly nit-picking "'', and ''"discouraging his positive contributions"''. I do not think that '''any''' of these things can be said about my edits. However, I will also note that ''"Threatening another person is considered harassment"''. This would appear to be exactly what you are doing to me. If any of my edits are inappropriate, or if you believe that the pattern somehow meets the definition of wikistalking despite the points above, then ''bring the matter to Arbcom''. I would be happy to defend my edits to disinterested parties. However, since IronDuke is taking your side in your current ArbCom case, I do not think you can claim to be a disinterested party here. -- ] 20:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 24 July 2006
Wikistalking
Anomicene, I was serious when I asked you to stay away from articles edited by Ironduke, so I'm disappointed to see that you followed him to one he created. Your accounts risk being blocked indefinitely if this continues. Please avoid editing the same articles as him, in order to allow this issue to settle down. SlimVirgin 19:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- SlimVirgin, as I have noted before, it is not my intention to "wikistalk" IronDuke, nor am I doing so. I observe that he is editing many pages (Gill Langley, List of people who assisted Jews during the Holocaust, Oprah Winfrey, Rachel Corrie, Canadian Union of Public Employees, and others) that I have no involvement with. Moreoever, the one you are complaining about, Global Relief Foundation, is linked from Mike Hawash, the only real page in contention. Are you actually objecting to the edits I made on Global Relief Foundation? I feel that they are NPOV and would stand up to any scrutiny required. The Misplaced Pages harassment policy says: "This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy." The examples given of wikistalking say things like: "facetious strawman arguments", "editing a large set of articles", "constantly nit-picking ", and "discouraging his positive contributions". I do not think that any of these things can be said about my edits. However, I will also note that "Threatening another person is considered harassment". This would appear to be exactly what you are doing to me. If any of my edits are inappropriate, or if you believe that the pattern somehow meets the definition of wikistalking despite the points above, then bring the matter to Arbcom. I would be happy to defend my edits to disinterested parties. However, since IronDuke is taking your side in your current ArbCom case, I do not think you can claim to be a disinterested party here. -- Anomicene 20:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)