| Revision as of 01:44, 25 July 2006 editEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 edits →Should this really be the destination page for []?: Opinion← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:09, 2 September 2006 edit undo71.50.80.91 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :Until there are other articles that actually use the name "War Machine" (proper noun), there's no reason to move this article and create a disambig page. As it is, "War Machine" isn't mentioned a single time on ]. As such, the comic book character is the dominant usage of the phrase, meaning that it can stay in its place. Not a bad question, though, and it is one that I would expect (and hope) will get revisited in the future to ensure that the phrase hasn't become more common. ] 01:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | :Until there are other articles that actually use the name "War Machine" (proper noun), there's no reason to move this article and create a disambig page. As it is, "War Machine" isn't mentioned a single time on ]. As such, the comic book character is the dominant usage of the phrase, meaning that it can stay in its place. Not a bad question, though, and it is one that I would expect (and hope) will get revisited in the future to ensure that the phrase hasn't become more common. ] 01:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Vandalism== | |||
| It seems that someone has recently edited the material of this article. I've re-edited it back to what I hope is the original format, but someone may want to cross-reference it with the original format just to be sure. ] | |||
Revision as of 18:09, 2 September 2006
 | Comics Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
War Machine MAX
Could there be an addition of the War Machine MAX series?
- Yes I think there should be (The Chuck Dixon one?) because it was controversial, being so right-wing.
- Actually,I think it was Chuck Austen.
Second War Machine
Who exactly was the second War Machine, the one portrayed as a villain in Iron Man vol.3? I know that Rhodes recognized him as a former Stark employee. An update with more info on the villainous War Machine would be nice.
Should this really be the destination page for War Machine?
It strikes me that when most people think of "war machine" they think of militarism or the military industrial complex or military in general. At the same time, this is the only article with the specific title War Machine, so I am not entirely comfortable changing this page's name to something like "War Machine (Comic Book)" and creating a redirect page for "War Machine" to collect the various uses. Does anyone here have any thoughts on what the correct solution to this problem might be? Thanks. Justinpwilsonadvocate 01:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Until there are other articles that actually use the name "War Machine" (proper noun), there's no reason to move this article and create a disambig page. As it is, "War Machine" isn't mentioned a single time on Military-industrial complex. As such, the comic book character is the dominant usage of the phrase, meaning that it can stay in its place. Not a bad question, though, and it is one that I would expect (and hope) will get revisited in the future to ensure that the phrase hasn't become more common. EVula 01:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
It seems that someone has recently edited the material of this article. I've re-edited it back to what I hope is the original format, but someone may want to cross-reference it with the original format just to be sure. The Chibi Kiriyama
Categories: