| Revision as of 02:18, 27 July 2006 view sourceEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:36, 27 July 2006 view source Xaosflux (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Importers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators83,906 edits →[]: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :Sounds fine to me; I'll add you to ]. <tt>;)</tt> <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 02:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | :Sounds fine to me; I'll add you to ]. <tt>;)</tt> <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 02:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Bot meta icons== | |||
| Noticed that the sitenotice was running over your bot meta icon on ], the one I have at ] may work better for you. — ] <sup>]</sup> 04:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 27 July 2006
User talk:Essjay/Top User:Essjay/Talk TOC
WP:B/AG
Sure I'd go for being in the group. The way I see it there are a few parts to bot approvals (aside form the published criteria):
- Process analysis; some bot proposals need coaching in effective editing
- Policy applications; some bots skirt very close to policy issues.
- Community affect and input; there are some thigns people just don't want bots doing (like flagging pages for deletion).
I've got plenty of program process experience, but am lacking in python skills, so will stay away from code analysis of those types of requests if added. — xaosflux 02:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds fine to me; I'll add you to the bag. ;) Essjay (Talk) 02:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Bot meta icons
Noticed that the sitenotice was running over your bot meta icon on User:MediationBot, the one I have at User:Fluxbot/Bot may work better for you. — xaosflux 04:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)