Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:56, 13 May 2015

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. California This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Women scientists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: Lawrence Solomon (2008-04-12). "Misplaced Pages's Zealots: Solomon" (PDF). Financial Post. Lawrence Solomon (2008-04-19). "Hide your name on Wicked Pedia: Solomon". Financial Post. Lawrence Solomon (2008-04-25). "The real climate Martians: Solomon". National Post. Lawrence Solomon (July 8, 2008). "Wikipropaganda". National Review Online.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Naomi Oreskes. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Naomi Oreskes at the Reference desk.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Terminological note

The term "science historian" (as used in this article's first line and in the first sentence of the Merchants of Doubt section) is not one with which anyone in the history of science community self-identifies. It would accord better with usage if someone would change it to "historian of science."

Resource: Naomi Oreskes: fierce defender of climate change science – and scientists

Resource: Naomi Oreskes: fierce defender of climate change science – and scientists in the Christian Science Monitor July 18, 2011 by Randy Dotinga 99.181.134.246 (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

SciAm resource

Historian Hunts for Motives Behind Climate Change Doubt-Mongering: A Q&A with Naomi Oreskes "Historians search for those behind climate change contrarianism has documented the evolution of those raising doubts" by Rae Tyson and The Daily Climate Scientific American November 21, 2011 99.181.142.144 (talk) 06:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Naomi

Naomi seems to have been born in about 1960. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.202.87 (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

External links

USCD homepage link has died. Peaceandlonglife (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Third party sources

1. The article lacks third party sources in general
2. Background section uses lists of essays instead of describing her work and carrer
3. The Science and society essay section lacks any third party sourcing
4. The Merchants of Doubt section relies on a Grauniad article, and so far contains no review of scientific value

Serten 15:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Discussion of the lack of third party sources

Tags

User:Prokaryotes erased the only scientific reviews contained in the article so far. I don't see wether any contentious AfD has to do with third party reviews being erased. One was published in BioSocieties, the other one in Nature. The lack of third party quality sources is evident. Grauniad is not science btw. I will insofar restore the tagging first and wait for comments here second. I have however the impression, that dual and partisan standards are being used on related articles, see neutrality tag and the user trying to do away with scientific sources of the highest quality has a conflict of interest (COI). Serten 13:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I suggest you take a step back, think about your recent edits and arguments, and wait until the AfD discussion of Reiner Grundmann is complete. prokaryotes (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

You last edit comment was somewhat emotional. I would prefer you started to improve the article instead of deleting valid content and or appropriate tags. The use of real life scientific studies relevant for this subject is not impaired by any outcome of any AfD I am aware of. Serten 13:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm a bit confused about your tags. Taking them one at a time, what's your WP:COI claim? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

See above. Serten 14:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Is that in response to me? If so: I cannot find anything that supports a COI claim either in your comments nor anywhere on this talk page. Please be clear. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

To be clear, User:Prokaryotes' role with an outlet like climatestate is not adding credibility. He deleted two reviews in scientific journals, one of them in Nature, with a rather offensive comment. His talk page contains a statement asking to stop the AfD for Grundmann, here he asks to wait for the end. That sounds either incoherent or just weird, it could be explained by a sort of mission or agenda. Therefore COI. Wether the Grundmann AfD goes through is of NO interest at all for this article. Serten 18:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

So your major evidence for COI is a difference of opinion on content? Sorry, that does not fly. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• Serten, could you clarify, if this is your old account https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Polentario A user on my German WP page suggested that this would be you. prokaryotes (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• Biography articles of living people
• All unassessed articles
• Start-Class biography articles
• Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
• Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
• Science and academia work group articles
• Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
• Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
• WikiProject Biography articles
• Start-Class California articles
• Unknown-importance California articles
• WikiProject California articles
• Start-Class Women scientists articles
• Mid-importance Women scientists articles
• WikiProject Women scientists articles
• Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press