User:Polentarion: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:03, 13 May 2015 editProkaryotes (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users17,246 edits ANI Discussion← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:03, 13 May 2015 edit undoProkaryotes (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users17,246 edits →ANI Next edit →
Line 88:		Line 88:

	==ANI==		==ANI==
	] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.		] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 22:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:03, 13 May 2015

The account is identical with User:Serten II.

"We can do anything. Except standard German."

Articles initiated or reworked substantially

- Eurodance Rythm of the night Saturday night Rythm is a Ace

Offset DY reviews

Templates

Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Disputes
Misplaced Pages:Splitting

Great quotes of and about the Lords of climate

Whether the consensus is useful or not is irrelevant to this article. Politics is irrelevant to this article. Facts of life are irrelevant to this article.
Secretive solemnity according O.J. Bierbaum on Stefan George: „Feierlich sein ist alles! Sei dumm wie ein Thunfisch, temperamentlos wie eine Qualle, stier besessen wie ein narkotisierter Frosch, aber sei feierlich, und du wirst plötzlich Leute um dich sehen, die vor Bewunderung nicht mehr mäh sagen können.“ ;)
. Research from the field of science and technology studies are finding that manufacturing a consensus in the context of the IPCC has acted to hyper-politicize the scientific and policy debates, to the detriment of both. Arguments are increasingly being made to abandon the scientific consensus seeking approach in favor of open debate of the arguments themselves and discussion of a broad range of policy options that stimulate local and regional solutions to the multifaceted and interrelated issues of climate change, land use, resource management, cost effective clean energy solutions, and developing technologies to expand energy access efficiently. Judith Curry will be presenting No Consensus on Consensus arguments at a philosophy of science Conference entitled ‘The epistemic value of dissent in climate science’, scheduled for next fall.

An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be bothered to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag.
Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about.

You have not followed the instructions!

Please use your browser's back button and file the report correctly.

This is not the page to report! You most likely reached this page because you did not replace the User with the actual Username you are reporting. Please return to the main page and resubmit your report, but this time remember to replace User with the actual Username. Thank you. If you have any questions, please ask on the project talk page.

WP Civil

List of .... Serten (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
al zis skeptikuls ar dangarus
Armmond White

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. prokaryotes (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)