| Revision as of 23:35, 24 May 2015 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,847 edits →1482 Sebastiana: redir← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 24 May 2015 edit undoDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,847 edits →1482 Sebastiana: npaNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' and redirect title to ]. The subject fails ] and ].- ]] 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' and redirect title to ]. The subject fails ] and ].- ]] 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| **{{ping|Milowent}} please read and follow ]. This kind of AfD contribution is unconstructive and unhelpful. —] (]) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' and redirect per ]. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. <b>] ]</b> 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' and redirect per ]. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. <b>] ]</b> 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 24 May 2015
1482 Sebastiana
- 1482 Sebastiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect title to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. The subject fails WP:NASTCRIT and WP:GNG.- MrX 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Only delete or redirect (assuming not notable) if Boleyn rewrites List of minor planets: 1001–2000 to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that Boleyn be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that Boleyn should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--Milowent • 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Milowent: please read and follow Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks. This kind of AfD contribution is unconstructive and unhelpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect per WP:NASTRO. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. OhNoitsJamie 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak redirect. Other than a 24-body lightcurve study there's also a study of its polar angle, more specific to this object which shows it to have an unusual spin axis. But the details in the second study are still quite meager, so I don't think there's enough coverage to make an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)