Revision as of 01:04, 27 May 2015 editMcmatter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,489 edits →Borve - tags: I'm done with this conversation← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:27, 27 May 2015 edit undoMcmatter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,489 editsm CollapseNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=14|bot=MiszaBot III}} | {{AutoArchivingNotice|age=14|bot=MiszaBot III}} | ||
{{Signpost-subscription}} | {{Signpost-subscription}} | ||
{{cot|Completed Discussion}} | |||
== Borve - tags == | == Borve - tags == | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
:::::Millions of articles at this website contain unreferenced assertions. That's easily verifiable by choosing one at random linked from the main page.] (]) 18:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC) | :::::Millions of articles at this website contain unreferenced assertions. That's easily verifiable by choosing one at random linked from the main page.] (]) 18:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::::I have already challenged the content in the article by removing the unreferenced material, you are free to reinstate if can provide reliable sources for them. I am done arguing with you at this point. If you wish you can take this to ] or if you think I have violated any policies you may take it to ].- ] <sup>(])</sup>/<sub>(])</sub> 01:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | ::::::I have already challenged the content in the article by removing the unreferenced material, you are free to reinstate if can provide reliable sources for them. I am done arguing with you at this point. If you wish you can take this to ] or if you think I have violated any policies you may take it to ].- ] <sup>(])</sup>/<sub>(])</sub> 01:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{cob}} |
Revision as of 01:27, 27 May 2015
This user has opted out of talkbacksPlease do not use talkback templates, if I have started a conversation on your talk page I will have your page on my watchlist and will know if you reply. On the other side of the coin if you start a conversation on my talk page I will reply on my talk page and will not leave a talkback template on your talk page so please watch for my response.
This is Mcmatter's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This is Mcmatter's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
24 December 2024 |
|
Completed Discussion |
---|
Borve - tagsHi, You have added tags to the article on Borve, Lewis. One states that "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed." Please can you identify which statements in the article require references in your opinion. The only two references that the article contained before my revision were to a road users' site (to verify what number road the village is on) and a Scottish places site (to verify what larger administrative area it is part of). Those references seem completely unnecessary because the information is not seriously open to challenge and in the event that someone does read the article and think "Hey, you're saying the village is on the A857 - well that's an assertion I challenge!", they can easily go and verify it elsewhere, just as if someone challenges the assertion that London is located in England. The second states that "This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed." Please can you decide whether you think it does or does not contain original research and if you decide you think it does, please can you identify which claims you think should be either verified or removed. Thanks! Lordelephapia (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
|