Revision as of 07:37, 30 May 2015 editEpeefleche (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers150,049 edits →Repeated deletions of inlines: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:06, 6 July 2018 edit undoCommunity Tech bot (talk | contribs)Bots267,052 editsm File(s) used on this page are up for deletionNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I've already explained this to you, both in edit summaries, above, and . I ask you again, and warn you again, to stop edit warring. The inline of the person's name allows the reader to know that there is more to be read, if they wish to go there, about the person by clicking on their name and going to the article it leads to. --] (]) 07:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | ::I've already explained this to you, both in edit summaries, above, and . I ask you again, and warn you again, to stop edit warring. The inline of the person's name allows the reader to know that there is more to be read, if they wish to go there, about the person by clicking on their name and going to the article it leads to. --] (]) 07:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion == | |||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: | |||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2018-07-06T16:06:31.609835 | ICCP pic.jpg --> | |||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. ] (]) 16:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:06, 6 July 2018
Islam Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Arizona Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Repeated deletions of inlines
An editor has now repeatedly ... in a slow-motion edit war ... deleted inlines to redirects. Asserting, without basis, that they are "useless". They are in fact useful. They alert readers here to the fact that there is discussion of the subjects at the page in question. Which, of course, is the entire purpose of redirects. --Epeefleche (talk) 21:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Why not just guide your way through the article? That's just pure laziness. Libertarian12111971 (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- I've already explained this to you, both in edit summaries, above, and here. I ask you again, and warn you again, to stop edit warring. The inline of the person's name allows the reader to know that there is more to be read, if they wish to go there, about the person by clicking on their name and going to the article it leads to. --Epeefleche (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Categories: